SSG-58 Radiation Safety in the Use of Nuclear Gauges

Sekce Odstavec Text
Main 1.1. As stated in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF-1, Fundamental Safety Principles [1]:“The fundamental safety objective is to protect people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.” Paragraph 2.1 of SF-1 [1] states:
Main “This fundamental safety objective of protecting people — individually and collectively — and the environment has to be achieved without unduly limiting the operation of facilities or the conduct of activities that give rise to radiation risks.”
Main 1.2. Paragraph 2.2 of SF-1 [1] states:
Main 1.3. There are several hundred thousand nuclear gauges incorporating a radioactive source or a radiation generator in use all over the world. They have been used in a wide range of industries [2] to improve the quality of products, optimize processes, and save energy and materials. The economic benefits have been amply demonstrated and there is clear evidence that nuclear gauge technology can be used safely and will continue to play an important role in a wide range of industries.
Main 1.4. There are three main categories of nuclear gauge used in industry [2]:
  • Transmission gauges, used to measure density, thickness and levels of materials: The source housing and the radiation detector are on opposite sides of the material under investigation and the radiation is attenuated as it travels through the material. Such gauges traditionally used radioactive sources (beta and gamma); however, X ray generators are increasingly being used and are now a popular type of radiation source in transmission gauges.

  • Backscatter gauges, used to measure the thickness of coatings: The detector and source housing are on the same side of the material and therefore the detector has to be shielded from the primary radiation. The radiation enters the material, interacts with it and scatters back. Radioactive sources (beta, gamma and occasionally neutron) are typically used in such gauges. The back-scattered radiation is measured by the radiation detector and is related to the coating thickness.

  • Reactive gauges, for example used for elemental analysis: Certain radiation sources (X ray and neutron) can cause fluorescent X ray emissions in the material being analysed. X ray generators and neutron sources (radioactive sources or radiation generators) are used in some reactive gauges.

Main 1.5. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1.9, Categorization of Radioactive Sources [3] provides a relative ranking of radioactive sources in terms of their potential to cause severe deterministic effects (i.e. how potentially hazardous they could be if misused). The categorization system set out in RS-G-1.9 has five categories, wherein sources in Category 1 are considered to be the most ‘dangerous’. Radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges normally fall into Category 3 or Category 4.
Main 1.6. This Safety Guide is one of a number of Safety Guides on industrial uses of ionizing radiation, including for industrial irradiators, industrial radiography, well logging and radioisotope production facilities [4–7].
Main 1.7. Unless otherwise stated, terms used in this Safety Guide have the meanings ascribed to them in the IAEA Safety Glossary [8].
Main 1.8. It is assumed in this Safety Guide that an effective governmental, legal and regulatory infrastructure for radiation safety for the use of nuclear gauges is in place in the State.
Main 1.9. The objective of this Safety Guide is to provide recommendations on how to meet the relevant requirements of IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards [9] in relation to the use of nuclear gauges.
Main 1.10 The guidance in this publication is aimed primarily at operating organizations that are authorized to use nuclear gauges, as well as their employees and radiation protection officers. The guidance will also be of interest to regulatory bodies, and to designers, manufacturers, suppliers, and maintenance and servicing organizations of nuclear gauges.
Main 1.11. This Safety Guide provides recommendations on the design, construction and use of fixed (i.e. installed) nuclear gauges and portable (mobile) nuclear gauges. This Safety Guide specifically considers: the responsibilities of relevant parties; the installation, use, maintenance and decommissioning of nuclear gauges; developing safety assessments and local rules; radiation monitoring; transport of radioactive materials; and arrangements for preparedness and response for incidents and accidents.
Main 1.12. This Safety Guide also provides information on the need for appropriate nuclear security measures and provides recommendations on their interfaces with safety measures, but does not provide specific guidance on aspects of nuclear security. Additional guidance on nuclear security can be found in the IAEA Nuclear Security Series.
Main 1.13. The use of radiation sources for security purposes (e.g. X ray inspection of luggage for dangerous items) is outside the scope of this Safety Guide.
Main 1.14. Section 2 describes the duties and responsibilities of organizations and individuals in respect of nuclear gauges. The preparation of a safety assessment and a radiation protection programme for nuclear gauges are described in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Recommendations on training of personnel are provided in Section 5. Sections 6 and 7 provide recommendations on individual monitoring of workers and workplace monitoring, respectively. Subsequent sections provide recommendations on the control of radioactive sources (Section 8), the security of radioactive sources (Section 9), the safe use of fixed nuclear gauges and portable nuclear gauges (Sections 10 and 11, respectively), and the safe transport of radioactive sources (Section 12). Preparedness for and response to emergencies involving gauging sources is described in Section 13.
Main 1.15. An overview of nuclear gauge radiation sources and applications is provided in Annex I. Considerations for a safety assessment for nuclear gauges and for local rules for nuclear gauges are provided in Annex II. Some examples of incidents involving nuclear gauges are given in Annex III.
Main 2.1. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 1 (Rev. 1), Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety [10] establishes requirements for the governmental, legal and regulatory infrastructure for safety of facilities and activities, including those associated with the use of nuclear gauges, and assigns duties and responsibilities to relevant parties. GSR Part 3 [9] provides the general framework for these duties and responsibilities, and this section provides recommendations on the various duties and responsibilities in the context of nuclear gauges.
Main 2.2. Paragraph 2.15 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Provides the statutory basis for requirements for protection and safety for all exposure situations;

  • Specifies that the prime responsibility for protection and safety rests with the person or organization responsible for facilities and activities that give rise to radiation risks;

  • Specifies the scope of its applicability;

  • Establishes and provides for maintaining an independent regulatory body with clearly specified functions and responsibilities for the regulation of protection and safety;

  • Provides for coordination between authorities with responsibilities relevant to protection and safety for all exposure situations.”

Main 2.3. Paragraph 2.16 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.4. Paragraph 2.17 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The government shall ensure that the regulatory body has the legal authority, competence and resources necessary to fulfil its statutory functions and responsibilities.”
Main 2.5. Requirement 3 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The regulatory body shall establish or adopt regulations and guides for protection and safety and shall establish a system to ensure their implementation.” Many States have decided to adopt the IAEA’s standards for use in their national regulations.
Main 2.6. Paragraph 2.30 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Notification and authorization;

  • Review and assessment of facilities and activities;

  • Inspection of facilities and activities;

  • Enforcement of regulatory requirements;

  • The regulatory functions relevant to emergency exposure situations and existing exposure situations;

  • Provision of information to, and consultation with, parties affected by its decisions and, as appropriate, the public and other interested parties.”

Main 2.7. Paragraph 2.31 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.8. Paragraph 2.32 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The regulatory body shall ensure the application of the requirements for education, training, qualification and competence in protection and safety of all persons engaged in activities relevant to protection and safety.”
Main 2.9. Paragraph 2.33 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.10. Paragraph 2.34 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.11. Radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges should have the relevant characteristics, and meet the performance and safety testing criteria, specified in ISO 2919 [11]. An example of acceptance and performance criteria for gauges designed for permanent installation is provided in IEC 62598 [12]. The regulatory body should establish or adopt performance standards and specific acceptance criteria for nuclear gauges and associated radiation sources that are authorized for distribution and use.
Main 2.12. Paragraph 2.35 of GSR Part 3 [9] states (footnote omitted):
  • Registers of sealed sources and radiation generators;

  • Records of doses from occupational exposure;

  • Records relating to the safety of facilities and activities;

  • Records that might be necessary for the shutdown and decommissioning or closure of facilities;

  • Records of events, including non-routine releases of radioactive material to the environment;

  • Inventories of radioactive waste...”

Main 2.13. The regulatory body should also make provision for establishing, maintaining and retrieving adequate records of:
  • The transport of radioactive sources;

  • The location of radioactive sources;

  • Incidents involving radiation sources, such as loss of radioactive sources, damage to radioactive sources and theft of radioactive sources or radiation generators.

Main 2.14. The regulatory body should perform inspection activities relating to the use of nuclear gauges [13]. These inspections should verify that the operating organization is in compliance with the regulatory requirements and with any conditions specified in the authorization. Periodic inspections of facilities and activities should be part of a schedule developed by the regulatory body; in addition, reactive inspections should be conducted in response to a request made by the operating organization, or after an incident. Inspections can be announced or unannounced, as deemed appropriate by the regulatory body. A graded approach should be adopted in the conduct of inspections of facilities and activities such that the frequency and complexity of inspections are commensurate with the radiation risks associated with the facility or activity.
Main 2.15. Inspections should review a range of issues relating to the safe use of nuclear gauges, and should include the following:
  • Review of compliance with the conditions of the authorization to possess and use nuclear gauges; for example, checking that the inventory includes only those gauges and radiation sources that are authorized, and that gauges are used only for authorized purposes at authorized locations. The temporary use of gauges at client facilities should be subject to specific authorization conditions relating to temporary storage, operation and transport of the gauges. If any authorized source is missing or if any source is found to be not properly authorized, the matter should be investigated and appropriate actions implemented (an immediate search should be performed for missing sources, and any unauthorized sources should be brought under regulatory control).

  • Confirmation that radiation sources and nuclear gauges meet the acceptance criteria and performance criteria established by the regulatory body.

  • Measurement of radiation levels around nuclear gauges and confirmation of compliance with authorized levels.

  • Review of the records of workplace monitoring and of safety assessments performed by the operating organization, to determine whether (and under what circumstances) personal dosimetry is appropriate.

  • Observing the use of nuclear gauges, including procedures for safe use and, where appropriate, source handling procedures.

  • Checking the arrangements for the safety and security of each radiation source before the installation of the gauge, during its use and after the end of the useful life of the source.

  • Review of control measures (e.g. the conduct of periodic source inventory checks, controls to ensure that sources are only used by authorized individuals, use of appropriate engineered controls), storage conditions for portable gauges and for disused sources, and emergency procedures.

  • Review of compliance with regulatory requirements for transport of radioactive material (see Section 12), especially with regard to the use of portable gauges at client facilities.

  • Where appropriate, performance of on-site inspections at client facilities where portable gauges are being used.

Main 2.16. Paragraph 2.38 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The regulatory body shall establish, implement, assess and strive to continually improve a management system that is aligned with the goals of the regulatory body and that contributes to the achievement of those goals.”
Main 2.17. Requirement 19 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.18. Paragraph 3.69 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The government or the regulatory body shall establish the responsibilities of employers, registrants and licensees with regard to application of the requirements for occupational exposure in planned exposure situations.”
Main 2.19. In accordance with para. 3.72 of GSR Part 3 [9], before authorization of a new or modified practice involving a nuclear gauge, the regulatory body should review the design criteria and design features relating to the exposure and potential exposure of workers in all operational states, and in accident conditions. Only nuclear gauges that meet the design standards stipulated by the regulatory body should be permitted to be used. Because of the stringent design standards applicable to nuclear gauges, individual monitoring is expected to be limited to certain types of worker and certain types of gauge (see Section 6). However, in all cases, the regulatory body should verify that the operating organization complies with workplace monitoring requirements (see paras 3.96–3.98 of GSR Part 3 [9]) in all facilities and activities involving nuclear gauges.
Main 2.20. The regulatory body should require that arrangements be made for the safety and security of radioactive sources, including financial provisions, where appropriate, for sources that have become disused. Specifically, the regulatory body should attach conditions to authorizations that require the operating organization to make arrangements for the safe and secure management of disused sources, including, where applicable, agreements regarding the return of disused sources to the supplier, in accordance with the Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources [14].
Main 2.21. The regulatory body should require the operating organization to conduct periodic inventory checks of the radioactive sources in nuclear gauges, and to provide information, as appropriate, to the regulatory body for inclusion in a national register of radioactive sources [14].
Main 2.22. There are certain activities relating to the use of nuclear gauges — such as installation of gauges, removal of gauges from service, and maintenance and repair of gauges — that involve or potentially affect components relating to the safety of the gauge (e.g. the source, source holder, source drive mechanism, shutter, shutter control or shielding). Such activities require specialized training and equipment in order to be performed safely; therefore, these activities are often performed by the gauge manufacturer, source supplier or other service provider. The regulatory body should establish requirements concerning the performance of such activities, which may include requirements for a specific authorization to perform these activities.
Main 2.23. With regard to nuclear gauges, the operating organization is typically the owner of the industrial facility in which fixed nuclear gauges are installed, or the company undertaking activities with portable nuclear gauges. The operating organization has the prime responsibility for protection and safety (see Requirements 4 and 9 of GSR Part 3 [9]) and is required to ensure that protection and safety is optimized (Requirement 11 of GSR Part 3 [9]). The manufacturers and suppliers of nuclear gauges that contain radiation sources are also operating organizations with their own responsibilities for protection and safety.
Main 2.24. The operating organization is required to demonstrate commitment to protection and safety at the highest levels (para. 2.47 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Main 2.25. The operating organization is required to submit an application to the regulatory body for authorization to operate a facility or conduct an activity involving nuclear gauges (Requirement 7 of GSR Part 3 [9]). Consequently, for an authorized facility, the operating organization is normally also the licensee or registrant as defined in GSR Part 3 [9].
Main 2.26. As stated in para. 2.42 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization:
  • Shall adopt objectives for protection and safety in accordance with the requirements of [GSR Part 3];

  • Shall apply measures for protection and safety that are commensurate with the radiation risks associated with the exposure situation and that are adequate to ensure compliance with the requirements of [GSR Part 3].”

Main 2.27. As stated in para. 2.43 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization:
  • The measures and resources that are necessary for achieving the objectives for protection and safety have been determined and are duly provided;

  • The programme is periodically reviewed to assess its effectiveness and its continued fitness for purpose;

  • Any failures or shortcomings in protection and safety are identified and corrected, and steps are taken to prevent their recurrence;

  • Arrangements are made to consult with interested parties;

  • Appropriate records are maintained.”

Main 2.28. Paragraph 2.44 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Main 2.29. The operating organization is required to allow access by authorized representatives of the regulatory body to conduct inspections of its facilities and activities and of its protection and safety records, and is required to cooperate in the conduct of inspections (para. 2.45 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Main 2.30. The operating organization is required to ensure that qualified experts (see paras 2.41–2.45) are identified and consulted as necessary on the proper observance of the requirements established in GSR Part 3 (para. 2.46 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Main 2.31. The operating organization is required to ensure that protection and safety is effectively integrated into its overall management system (Requirement 5 of GSR Part 3 [9]). The management system is required to be commensurate with the radiation risks associated with the number and type of nuclear gauges in the possession of the operating organization (para. 2.49 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Main 2.32. As stated in para. 2.48 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization (footnote omitted):
  • Applying the requirements for protection and safety coherently with other requirements, including requirements for operational performance, and coherently with guidelines for security;

  • Describing the planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that the requirements for protection and safety are fulfilled;

  • Ensuring that protection and safety are not compromised by other requirements;

  • Providing for the regular assessment of performance for protection and safety, and the application of lessons learned from experience;

  • Promoting safety culture.”

Main 2.33. As stated in para. 2.50 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization: “shall be able to demonstrate the effective fulfilment of the requirements for protection and safety in the management system.”
Main 2.34. As stated in para. 3.60 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization: “shall ensure that arrangements are made promptly for the safe management of and control over radiation generators and radioactive sources, including appropriate financial provision, once it has been decided to take them out of use.” Recommendations on meeting the requirements relating to radiation generators and radioactive sources in nuclear gauges are provided in Section 10 of this Safety Guide.
Safety culture 2.35. Because of the engineered safety features incorporated into the design of nuclear gauges, there is a relatively low reliance on the observance of safe working procedures. Therefore, there is a risk that safety might be taken for granted and that safety culture might not be assigned its due importance in facilities using nuclear gauges. In accordance with para. 2.51 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization should promote and maintain safety culture by doing the following:
  • Promoting individual and collective commitment to protection and safety at all levels of the organization, including staff responsible for administration, security and storage facilities, as well as workers involved in the operation and maintenance of nuclear gauges.

  • Ensuring a common understanding of the key aspects of safety culture within the organization.

  • Supporting individuals and teams in performing their tasks safely and successfully, with account taken of the interactions between individuals, the nuclear gauge technology and the organization. For example, if maintenance work is to be performed in the vicinity of a gauge installation, coordination among the maintenance staff, gauge operating staff and the radiation protection officer is necessary.

  • Encouraging open communication and participation of gauge operating staff, the radiation protection officer(s) and other workers in the facility in the development and implementation of policies and procedures dealing with protection and safety relating to nuclear gauges.

  • Ensuring accountability of the organization and of individuals at all levels for protection and safety in the procurement, storage, installation, operation, maintenance, handling and safe management of sources until their safe disposal after the end of their useful life.

  • Encouraging a questioning and learning attitude, discouraging complacency, with regard to protection and safety and providing means by which the organization continually seeks to develop and strengthen its safety culture.

Safety culture 2.36. The operating organization should also ensure that personnel feel free to raise safety concerns without fear of retaliation, intimidation, harassment or discrimination.
Human factors 2.37. Paragraph 2.52 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Sound ergonomic principles are followed in the design of equipment and the development of operating procedures, so as to facilitate the safe operation and use of equipment, to minimize the possibility that operator errors could lead to accidents, and to reduce the possibility that indications of normal conditions and abnormal conditions could be misinterpreted.

  • Appropriate equipment, safety systems and procedural requirements are provided, and other necessary provision is made:

    1. To reduce, as far as practicable, the possibility that human errors or inadvertent actions could give rise to accidents or to other incidents leading to the exposure of any person;

    2. To provide means for detecting human errors and for correcting them or compensating for them;

    3. To facilitate protective actions and corrective actions in the event of failures of safety systems or failures of measures for protection and safety.”

  • To reduce, as far as practicable, the possibility that human errors or inadvertent actions could give rise to accidents or to other incidents leading to the exposure of any person;

  • To provide means for detecting human errors and for correcting them or compensating for them;

  • To facilitate protective actions and corrective actions in the event of failures of safety systems or failures of measures for protection and safety.”

Human factors 2.38. Paragraph 3.94(e) of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 2.39. Paragraph 3.96 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 2.40. The radiation protection officer should be a person technically competent in radiation protection in relation to the use of nuclear gauges, and who is designated by the operating organization to oversee the application of relevant requirements. The appointment of the radiation protection officer should be done in writing and the radiation protection officer’s roles and responsibilities should be integrated into the job description.
Human factors 2.41. As stated in para. 2.46 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization: “shall ensure that qualified experts are identified and are consulted as necessary on the proper observance of [GSR Part 3]”. A qualified expert is an individual who, by virtue of certification by appropriate boards or societies, professional licences or academic qualifications and experience, is duly recognized as having expertise in a relevant field of specialization, for example in radiation protection and the safe operation of nuclear gauges [8].
Human factors 2.42. The government is required to establish requirements for the formal recognition of qualified experts (para. 2.21 of GSR Part 3 [9]). ‘Formal recognition’ means documented acknowledgment or accreditation by the relevant authority that a person has the qualifications, training, education, experience and expertise required for the responsibilities that he or she will bear in relation to the use of nuclear gauges [9]. The procedure for formal recognition of qualified experts may vary from State to State.
Human factors 2.43. The operating organization may consult with one or more qualified experts on matters relevant to radiation safety, such as the design of nuclear gauges and associated facilities, radiation shielding calculations, and testing and maintenance of workplace monitoring instruments. The responsibility for compliance with regulatory requirements cannot be delegated to the qualified expert and always remains with the operating organization.
Human factors 2.44. Qualified experts do not necessarily have to be employees of the operating organization; they may be appointed on a part time basis or for a specific period or purpose. The qualified expert should satisfy all the requirements for qualification or certification criteria specified by the State where the nuclear gauge is being used and have suitable experience (i.e. with facilities and activities involving nuclear gauges).
Human factors 2.45. The qualified expert should work in close cooperation with the radiation protection officer to ensure that all the necessary duties and tasks are performed.
Human factors 2.46. A worker is any person who works, whether full time, part time or temporarily, for an employer and who has recognized rights and duties in relation to occupational radiation protection [8].
Human factors 2.47. Workers are required to fulfil their obligations and perform their duties for protection and safety (Requirement 22 of GSR Part 3 [9]). In particular, para. 3.83 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Shall follow any applicable rules and procedures for protection and safety as specified by the employer, registrant or licensee;

  • Shall use properly the monitoring equipment and personal protective equipment provided;

  • Shall cooperate with the employer, registrant or licensee with regard to protection and safety, and programmes for workers’ health surveillance and programmes for dose assessment;

  • Shall provide to the employer, registrant or licensee such information on their past and present work that is relevant for ensuring effective and comprehensive protection and safety for themselves and others;

  • Shall abstain from any wilful action that could put themselves or others in situations that would not be in accordance with the requirements of [GSR Part 3];

  • Shall accept such information, instruction and training in protection and safety as will enable them to conduct their work in accordance with the requirements of [GSR Part 3].”

Human factors 2.48. Paragraph 3.84 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “A worker who identifies circumstances that could adversely affect protection and safety shall report such circumstances to the employer, registrant or licensee as soon as possible.” Employers should not take adverse or punitive actions against a worker who reports such circumstances.
Human factors 2.49. Requirement 23 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “Employers and registrants and licensees shall cooperate to the extent necessary for compliance by all responsible parties with the requirements for protection and safety.” An example of such cooperation is that which is expected to occur between the operating organization using a portable gauge and the client (i.e. the owner of the site on which the gauge is used; see paras 2.56–2.61).
Human factors 2.50. Paragraph 3.85 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 2.51. Paragraph 3.86 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • The development and use of specific restrictions on exposure and other means of ensuring that the measures for protection and safety for workers who are engaged in work that involves or could involve a source that is not under the control of their employer are at least as good as those for employees of the registrant or licensee;

  • Specific assessments of the doses received by workers as specified in (a) above;

  • A clear allocation and documentation of the responsibilities of the employer and those of the registrant or licensee for protection and safety.”

Human factors 2.52. Paragraph 3.87 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Shall obtain from the employers, including self-employed persons, the previous occupational exposure history of workers … and any other necessary information;

  • Shall provide appropriate information to the employer, including any available information relevant for compliance with the requirements of [GSR Part 3] that the employer requests;

  • Shall provide both the worker and the employer with the relevant exposure records.”

Human factors 2.53. Operating organizations that hire workers on a short term basis (for example, using density gauges in connection with construction of roads, bridges) should ensure that such workers have the same level of protection and safety as workers employed on a permanent basis. Such short term workers (sometimes called itinerant workers) typically work for a relatively short period of time (e.g. a few weeks) with the operating organization before leaving to work for another employer. It should be ensured that such working practices are in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 2.54. The relevant responsibilities of the operating organization and the itinerant worker should be clearly specified in the contractual arrangements. The operating organization should request information on any occupational exposure received by the itinerant worker, as well as details of any health surveillance up to the time the worker commences work.
Human factors 2.55. The operating organization and the itinerant worker should fulfil their respective responsibilities, as specified in regulations. The operating organization should clarify with the itinerant worker the allocation of responsibilities for matters such as the following:
  • The provision of individual dosimetry and dose record keeping, if required (see Section 6);

  • Health surveillance arrangements, if required (see Section 4);

  • Workplace monitoring arrangements (see Section 7);

  • Local rules (see Section 4).

Human factors 2.56. The operating organization should verify that the itinerant worker has the appropriate qualifications and has received adequate training in both radiation safety and in normal operation as well as in any special procedures he or she will undertake with nuclear gauges. The operating organization should ensure that all procedures and other relevant documents are provided in a language understood by the itinerant worker.
Human factors 2.57. With regard to portable nuclear gauges, the client is the organization or person that hires the operating organization to undertake activities with a nuclear gauge on the client’s site. In the case of installed nuclear gauges, the owner of the site or facility is also normally the operating organization. However, the owner of the site or facility can, in some circumstances, also be a client, for example when installation or maintenance work is performed in the facility by specialist nuclear gauge contractors.
Human factors 2.58. The client should always use an operating organization that is authorized by the regulatory body in accordance with regulatory requirements for nuclear gauges. The operating organization should insist on sufficient time to plan the work and to perform it safely, and to enable compliance with any requirements to notify the regulatory body in advance of the work.
Human factors 2.59. The operating organization should not accept conditions or limitations that would prevent it from performing activities involving nuclear gauges in a safe manner. The client should ensure that such activities are coordinated with other work on the site, to minimize the risks from site specific hazards and to minimize the radiation exposure of other workers. Arrangements should be made for coordination if more than one operating organization is working on the client’s site at one time. A ‘permit-to-work’ system can facilitate communication and coordination of different activities on the same site.
Human factors 2.60. The client is responsible for ensuring a safe working environment in locations where access with the portable gauge might be necessary on the site. The client is also responsible for informing workers from the operating organization about safety issues that are site specific, and should provide the visiting workers with any necessary training, in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 2.61. If radioactive sources are to be stored temporarily on the client’s site, both the client and the operating organization should ensure that the storage arrangements are safe and secure, and that any necessary authorizations are obtained from the regulatory body. Procedures for gaining access to the radioactive source(s) should be clearly defined for the client and the operating organization and adhered to (see also Section 8).
Human factors 2.62. In the event of an incident involving the gauge with a potential for exposure of individuals to radiation, the client should extend all necessary cooperation to the operating organization to manage the incident in compliance with regulatory requirements (see Section 13).
Human factors 3.1. Requirement 13 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 3.2. Some of the radiation sources used in nuclear gauges can produce high dose rates and hence should be subject to a comprehensive safety assessment. Nuclear gauges containing radioactive material that is of low activity (and which is above the exemption levels specified by the regulatory body) should also be subject to a safety assessment, but in this case the safety assessment is expected to be much more straightforward, applying a graded approach commensurate with the magnitude of exposure. For nuclear gauges of an identical type, it might be acceptable to conduct a generic safety assessment.
Human factors 3.3. The initial safety assessment, sometimes called a ‘prior radiological evaluation’, is the primary tool for determining which control measures should be taken, and for confirming that all factors that have a bearing on protection and safety are considered. In accordance with Requirement 13 of GSR Part 3 [9], the safety assessment is required to be documented and, where appropriate, independently reviewed within the operating organization’s management system.
Human factors 3.4. Prospective users of nuclear gauges should submit a safety assessment to the regulatory body when applying for an authorization; therefore, the safety assessment should be prepared and documented before the nuclear gauge is received by the operating organization. Suppliers of nuclear gauges should seek an appropriate authorization before marketing gauges in a State, in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the State.
Human factors 3.5. The operating organization should plan ahead, to ensure that there is sufficient time for the required control measures for protection and safety to be established and applied. A new safety assessment might not be necessary when a source in a nuclear gauge has been replaced with a source of an identical type unless there are changes in the working arrangements, for example a significant increase in occupancy of the area around the gauge installation.
Human factors 3.6. In the case of work being conducted for which no safety assessment has been made, the operating organization should perform and document a retrospective safety assessment. On the basis of the retrospective safety assessment, either it should be confirmed that all the necessary control measures are in place, or else additional control measures should be identified and implemented.
Human factors 3.7. For nuclear gauges, the safety assessment should include consideration of the following:
  • The dose rates from shielded and unshielded radioactive sources and from radiation generators (X ray and neutron), as appropriate;

  • The exposure of workers and the public from normal operation of nuclear gauges, and potential exposures from reasonably foreseeable incidents (including exposures due to loss or reduction of radiation shielding incorporated in the design of the nuclear gauge, due to contamination from a damaged radioactive source, and from other scenarios, including very low probability events);

  • Limits and technical conditions for operation of the nuclear gauge(s);

  • Ways in which structures, systems and components, as well as procedures relating to protection and safety, might fail or might otherwise lead to potential exposures, and the consequences of such failures or potential exposures;

  • Ways in which external factors, operating errors and human factors could affect protection and safety;

  • The implications of any proposed modifications for protection and safety;

  • Any uncertainties or assumptions, and their implications for protection and safety.

Human factors 3.8. The safety assessment should be used by the operating organization to provide a basis for decision making in relation to the following:
  • The engineered control measures that are necessary for safety, for example to prevent access to the primary beam of a nuclear gauge.

  • The administrative controls that are necessary for safety, for example the procedures required to control entry into vessels on which level gauges are installed, particularly when the shutter is open.

  • The development of safe working procedures (local rules) for storage, operation, maintenance of a source inventory, servicing and maintenance, and management of disused sources.

  • Procedures for designating controlled areas and supervised areas (permanent and temporary).

  • Any measures necessary for the protection of the public.

  • The assessment of occupational exposures (see Section 6).

  • The training programme for gauge users and other persons (see Section 5).

  • An effective emergency preparedness and response programme to manage reasonably foreseeable events (including very low probability events). This should include: information on reasonably foreseeable incidents, the measures necessary to prevent or minimize the likelihood of occurrence of such incidents, and the necessary emergency response arrangements (including emergency plans and procedures, and emergency equipment) (see Section 13).

  • The security of radioactive sources in fixed gauges and portable gauges, with the objective of deterring, detecting, delaying and responding to the theft of sources (see Section 9).

Human factors 3.9. The safety assessment should be reviewed annually and whenever any of the following factors apply:
  • When safety might be compromised or affected as a result of modifications to facilities or to activities;

  • When the acquisition of a new radiation source or a source with different characteristics is planned;

  • When operating experience or the investigation of incidents, failures or errors indicates that current safety measures are invalid or are not fully effective;

  • When significant changes to relevant standards, regulations or guidance have been made or are envisaged.

Human factors 3.10. The operating organization should ensure that the safety assessment reflects current working practices and that no changes have been overlooked.
Human factors 3.11. The safety assessment should be documented and independently reviewed within the operating organization’s management system. Revisions and modifications of the safety assessment should be subject to audit by the regulatory body.
Human factors 3.12. A graded approach in relation to a regulatory system or a safety system is a process or method in which the stringency of the control measures and conditions to be applied is commensurate, to the extent practicable, with the likelihood and possible consequences of, and the level of risk associated with, a loss of control [8]. The regulatory body should adopt a graded approach to the implementation of the system of protection and safety, such that the application of regulatory requirements is commensurate with the radiation risks associated with the exposure situation.
Human factors 3.13. For fixed nuclear gauges there might be large numbers of workers routinely present in the immediate area; however, the radiation risk is normally very low. In contrast, when using portable nuclear gauges the number of workers present is often lower but the potential to receive occupational exposures is higher. These factors should be taken into account when developing and performing the safety assessment.
Human factors 3.14. The safety assessment should take into account that the magnitude of the individual doses, the number of people exposed and the likelihood of incurring potential exposures are all to be kept as low as reasonably achievable, economic and societal factors being taken into account. Any interaction between these various factors should be taken into account. If the next step of reducing the detriment can be achieved only by deploying resources disproportionate to the expected benefits, it might not be appropriate to take that step, provided that individuals have been adequately protected. Optimization is an iterative process and should also be applied when an existing practice is being reviewed [16].
Human factors 3.15. Owing to shielding and other safety features, the radiation exposures associated with the use of nuclear gauges are expected to be low, especially for installed gauges. In many cases, there is no need to provide additional engineered safety features, which would entail an additional expenditure for no significant reduction in the radiation risk.
Human factors 4.1. Requirement 24 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 4.2. Paragraph 3.93 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Engineered controls;

  • Administrative controls;

  • Personal protective equipment.”

Human factors 4.3. The radiation protection programme is a key factor in relation to the development and maintenance of safety culture within an organization. The radiation protection programme should cover the operating organization’s management structure, policies, responsibilities, procedures and organizational arrangements. All of these should be put in place by the operating organization to control radiation hazards and to optimize protection and safety. Detailed recommendations on establishing and maintaining a radiation protection programme for the protection of workers are provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-7, Occupational Radiation Protection [17].
Human factors 4.4. The radiation protection programme should be customized and scaled to meet the needs of the operating organization. The programme should reflect the complexities and hazards associated with the nuclear gauge facilities and activities. The programme should be based on the operating organization’s safety assessment (see Section 3), and it should address planned exposure situations and, as appropriate, emergency exposure situations (see Section 13).
Human factors 4.5. The operating organization should take into account any additional measures and programmes necessary to address other workplace hazards, which might include one or several of the following:
  • Chemical hazards;

  • Fire and explosion;

  • Noise and vibration;

  • Mechanical hazards (e.g. lifting equipment, rollers);

  • Heat (e.g. furnaces, ovens);

  • Hazards relating to pressure vessels.

Human factors 4.6. The radiation protection programme should cover the main elements contributing to protection and safety. The structure and content of the radiation protection programme should be documented to an appropriate level of detail, and should address the following essential elements:
  • The management structure and policies relevant to protection and safety;

  • The assignment of individual responsibilities for protection and safety;

  • A training programme on the nature of the radiation hazards, and on the measures required for protection and safety;

  • Local rules and the arrangements for supervision of the work with nuclear gauges;

  • The designation of controlled areas and supervised areas, as appropriate;

  • Safety and security of radioactive sources including management of disused sources;

  • Emergency preparedness and response;

  • The arrangements for assessing occupational exposure (if required) and for monitoring the workplace, including the acquisition, testing and maintenance of workplace monitoring instruments;

  • The programme for health surveillance of workers (if required);

  • A system for recording and reporting information relating to the control of exposures, the decisions regarding measures for occupational radiation protection and safety, and the results of individual monitoring and workplace monitoring;

  • Methods for periodically reviewing and auditing the performance of the radiation protection programme;

  • Requirements for quality assurance and procedures for process improvement.

Human factors 4.7. These elements of a radiation protection programme, which are more fully described in the following sections, can be incorporated into a single document or a series of documents, depending on the scale and complexity of operations. The radiation protection programme, or a summary of it, should be made available to workers.
Human factors 4.8. The radiation protection programme should include a description of the management structure as it relates to protection and safety. This structure could be represented in the form of an organizational chart. This chart should clearly show the lines of reporting, from workers to the senior managers with overall responsibility, and should list the names and contact details of persons with specific responsibilities for protection and safety (e.g. the radiation protection officer; see Section 2). If the operating organization has more than one location of operations, the management structure should clearly specify the lines of responsibility and the responsible persons at each location.
Human factors 4.9. The radiation protection programme should include the operating organization’s policies on radiation protection and safety, and should include a commitment by the management to keeping radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable and to fostering a positive safety culture.
Human factors 4.10. The radiation protection programme should describe the scope of the training programme in protection and safety for all workers directly involved in activities with nuclear gauges, including any associated emergency response actions. It should also include a ‘radiation awareness’ programme for other staff, where appropriate. Such staff include managers and general workers (i.e. individuals who are not working directly with nuclear gauges). The radiation protection programme should also specify the minimum educational and professional qualifications for relevant staff, especially the radiation protection officer and personnel involved in gauge installation and maintenance, in accordance with regulatory requirements. Section 5 provides more details on training and qualification of personnel.
Human factors 4.11. The operating organization should keep suitable training records, consistent with regulatory requirements. The record keeping arrangements should be specified in the radiation protection programme.
Human factors 4.12. Paragraph 3.94 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Shall establish in writing local rules and procedures that are necessary for protection and safety for workers and other persons;

  • Shall include in the local rules and procedures any relevant investigation level or authorized level, and the procedures to be followed in the event that any such level is exceeded;

  • Shall make the local rules and procedures and the measures for protection and safety known to those workers to whom they apply and to other persons who may be affected by them;

  • Shall ensure that any work in which workers are or could be subject to occupational exposure is adequately supervised and shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the rules, procedures, and measures for protection and safety are observed;

  • Shall designate, as appropriate, a radiation protection officer in accordance with criteria established by the regulatory body.”

Human factors 4.13. Local rules that describe the procedures for performing work with nuclear gauges should be written in a language that is understood by the workers who are expected to follow the rules. These local rules should cover all procedures associated with nuclear gauges where there is the potential for radiation exposure, such as installation, routine operations, source exchange, transport of radioactive sources, maintenance operations, cessation of use and disposal, as well as the procedures for emergency response (see Sections 8, 11, 12 and 13). The local rules are an important tool in the restriction of radiation doses. They should include sufficient information to allow workers to perform their duties safely and in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 4.14. A copy of the local rules should be provided to workers undertaking activities involving nuclear gauges and to other relevant persons; additional copies should be displayed in the work area, as appropriate. Managers should ensure that all relevant persons have read and understood the local rules.
Human factors 4.15. In organizations with a small number of gauges of a similar type, it might be appropriate to have one set of local rules covering all procedures. In larger organizations, especially those with a range of different gauging applications, it might be more appropriate to have several sets of specific local rules.
Human factors 4.16. Local rules should be provided for specific procedures, such as for performing work with portable nuclear gauges, and for exchanging radioactive sources in installed gauges. Some client organizations might also request specific local rules to be drawn up to cover gauging work on their premises.
Human factors 4.17. The operating organization is required to designate a radiation protection officer (see Section 2), and may appoint more than one qualified employee as radiation protection officer to oversee the day to day implementation of the local rules and to perform other duties as required in the radiation protection programme.
Human factors 4.18. A sample table of contents for local rules is provided in Table II–2 of Annex II.
Human factors 4.19. A radiation safety committee should be established in larger organizations that have a significant number of nuclear gauges or gauging applications, for the purpose of regularly reviewing the implementation of the radiation protection programme. This committee might be dedicated to radiation safety or it might also have other (conventional) safety related responsibilities. The radiation safety committee should include the radiation protection officer; health, safety and environment officers; servicing and maintenance engineers and security officers. The committee should also include the senior manager(s) responsible for radiation safety, and representatives of the workforce. The responsibilities of the radiation safety committee should include the following:
  • Regular reviews of the radiation protection programme;

  • Reviews of occupational radiation doses, workplace monitoring programme results and any incident reports prepared by the radiation protection officer;

  • Reviews of results of audits on the performance of the radiation protection programme;

  • Making recommendations to senior management for improvements in the radiation protection programme;

  • Provision of guidance and direction on the performance of the radiation protection officer’s duties;

  • Monitoring the investigation of any incident with the potential for unplanned exposure to radiation;

  • Preparation of reports about relevant radiation safety issues, and dissemination to managers and workers, as appropriate.

Human factors 4.20. Paragraph 3.88 of GSR Part 3 [9] states (footnote omitted):
  • Controlling exposures or preventing the spread of contamination in normal operation;

  • Preventing or limiting the likelihood and magnitude of exposures in anticipated operational occurrences and accident conditions.”

Human factors 4.21. Paragraph 3.89 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 4.22. Paragraph 3.90 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Shall delineate controlled areas by physical means or, where this is not reasonably practicable, by some other suitable means.

  • Shall, where a source is only intermittently brought into operation or energized, or is moved from place to place, delineate an appropriate controlled area by means that are appropriate under the prevailing circumstances and shall specify exposure times.

  • Shall display the symbol recommended by the International Organization for Standardization [see Ref. 18] and shall display instructions at access points to and at appropriate locations within controlled areas.

  • Shall establish measures for protection and safety, including, as appropriate, physical measures to control the spread of contamination and local rules and procedures for controlled areas.

  • Shall restrict access to controlled areas by means of administrative procedures such as the use of work permits, and by physical barriers, which could include locks or interlocks, the degree of restriction being commensurate with the likelihood and magnitude of exposures.

  • .......

  • .......

  • Shall periodically review conditions to assess whether there is any need to modify the measures for protection and safety or the boundaries of controlled areas[.]

  • Shall provide appropriate information, instruction and training for persons working in controlled areas.”

Human factors 4.23. As stated in para. 3.91 of GSR Part 3 [9]:
Human factors 4.24. The radiation protection programme should describe how controlled areas and supervised areas are to be designated. It should also describe the arrangements for delineating and restricting access to designated areas, the use of warning signs and the radiation monitoring programme.
Human factors 4.25. The designation of controlled areas and supervised areas should be based on the safety assessment (see Section 3), in particular on the dose rates in the workplace. Dose rates in the main beam of a nuclear gauge can be high, and where access to the beam is possible, the area should normally be designated as a controlled area.
Human factors 4.26. Fixed nuclear gauges designed to meet performance standards specified in IEC 62598 [12] should be procured and installed in such a way that there is no need to designate a controlled area around the outside of the gauge installation. Depending on the dose rate, the surrounding area might be designated as a supervised area.
Human factors 4.27. The radiation protection programme should describe the arrangements put in place by the operating organization for the selection, calibration, maintenance, testing and use of workplace monitoring equipment to measure the dose rates around nuclear gauges. The radiation protection programme should specify the locations where dose rate measurements around installed gauges and around portable gauges should be made and the frequency of such measurements. The programme should also describe the arrangements for recording the monitoring results and the length of time for which the records should be retained, in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 4.28. The radiation protection programme should specify suitable radiation monitors and the number of monitors that should be available. When using portable gauges for site work, a radiation monitor should always be available. For sites with stationary gauges, it is often sufficient to have one monitor in use and one available as a backup.
Human factors 4.29. The radiation protection programme should include dose rate investigation levels, as recommended in GSG-7 [17]. These investigation levels should represent the maximum dose rates that are acceptable, either around a gauge installation or during the performance of specific tasks. Such dose rate investigation levels should be consistent with regulatory requirements and guidance.
Human factors 4.30. The arrangements for workplace monitoring for nuclear gauges are described in more detail in Section 7.
Human factors 4.31. The safety assessment (see Section 3) should determine whether the assessment of occupational exposures by individual monitoring (see Section 6) is required. If it is required, the radiation protection programme should specify which workers are to be subject to individual monitoring, the types of dosimeter to be used, when the dosimeters are to be worn, and the arrangements for the assessment of dosimeters and for dose record keeping. The radiation protection programme should also specify that the dosimetry service provider should be appropriately approved or accredited. The radiation protection programme should provide guidance to the radiation protection officer on reviewing the dose records periodically to identify doses that are higher than usual and determining whether doses are as low as reasonably achievable.
Human factors 4.32. The safety assessment (see Section 3) should determine whether a health surveillance programme for persons working with nuclear gauges is required, in accordance with Requirement 25 of GSR Part 3 [9] and with regulatory requirements. If health surveillance is required, the radiation protection programme should include details of the arrangements for workers. This should include the assessment of the initial fitness and the continuing fitness of workers for their intended tasks. A qualified expert and/or an appropriately qualified occupational physician should be consulted regarding the establishment of the programme for health surveillance, which should be consistent with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 4.33. Medical examinations of occupationally exposed workers should follow the general principles of occupational medicine and should be conducted by an occupational physician. Each worker covered by the health surveillance programme should be subject to a medical examination before commencing work with radiation, and thereafter at specified intervals, in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 4.34. The initial medical examination should assess the health of workers and their fitness for the intended tasks, and should also identify those workers who have a condition that might necessitate particular precautions during work.
Human factors 4.35. Periodic medical examinations should focus on confirming that no clinical condition has developed that could prejudice the health of the worker while he or she is working in areas involving occupational health hazards, including radiation [17]. The nature and frequency of the periodic medical examination should depend on the type of work that is undertaken, the age and health status — and possibly the habits (e.g. smoking) — of the worker and other considerations that may be specified in the regulations. The frequency of periodic medical examinations should be determined on the basis of the state of health of the worker and the type of work he or she undertakes, but should typically be once a year.
Human factors 4.36. Medical records associated with the health surveillance programme should be confidential and should be preserved in a manner approved by the regulatory body. Such records should normally be retained for the lifetimes of the workers concerned.
Human factors 4.37. Health surveillance can also provide a baseline of information that can be used in the event of accidental exposure to a particular hazardous agent or in the event of occupational disease, and to provide workers with access to counselling with respect to any radiation risks to which they are or might be subjected.
Human factors 4.38. As an integral part of the operating organization’s management system, the radiation protection programme and its implementation should be reviewed on an annual basis. This periodic review should aim to identify problems and make recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the radiation protection programme.
Human factors 4.39. A key part of this periodic review process is a series of workplace audits. The operating organization should specify the designation and qualifications of the persons who will conduct these audits, the frequency of the audits, the expectations of the audit team, and the procedures for the reporting of results and their follow-up.
Human factors 4.40. Work with nuclear gauges should be performed in accordance with an established management system. This management system should be designed to ensure that all equipment and safety systems are regularly checked and tested, and that any faults or deficiencies are promptly brought to the attention of the management and quickly remedied.
Human factors 4.41. The management should ensure that the correct operating procedures and local rules are being followed, and that the management system specifies the relevant checks and audits to be made and the records to be kept. The relevant regulatory requirements should be taken into account and reflected in the management system.
Human factors 4.42. The management system should include a mechanism for the collection and feedback of lessons from incidents (including those reported within the organization and by other organizations), and how these lessons can be used to enhance safety.
Human factors 4.43. The management system should itself be reviewed and updated as necessary with reference to pre-identified performance indicators.
Human factors 5.1. The operating organization is responsible for ensuring that work with nuclear gauges is performed safely and in compliance with all relevant regulations and safety standards. The operating organization should, therefore, ensure that such work is performed only by staff who are suitably qualified or certified, and who are competent and trained in working with nuclear gauges as well as in protection and safety.
Human factors 5.2. The programmes for the training and qualification of persons working with nuclear gauges vary in scope and detail. In some cases, they might include only a limited amount of training in radiation safety. In such cases, training programmes should be supplemented with appropriate additional training in protection and safety specific to nuclear gauges for relevant persons. Such additional training may be provided by specialized training organizations rather than by the operating organization. Training courses in protection and safety may be provided by a range of training providers, including colleges, universities, radiation protection institutions and training consultants [19].
Human factors 5.3. Nuclear gauge personnel can be classified according to the required levels of competence in protection and safety, as follows:
  • Level 1: Personnel working in a supervised area.

  • Level 2: Personnel working with radiation sources (e.g. engaged in handling, transport, calibration, assembly and installation of gauges) and/or working in controlled areas.

Human factors 5.4. Training programmes should be established for the different levels of competence and should correspond to the roles and responsibilities of the workers. The training programme should include the criteria for passing written and practical examinations, where these are considered appropriate, as well as the procedures to be followed if an applicant fails an examination. The details of the training programme should be incorporated into the radiation protection programme.
Human factors 5.5. Each training course should be structured around specific aims and objectives and should be customized to the needs of the target audience [19]. A summary of the essential elements for basic training in radiation safety for level 2 nuclear gauge personnel is provided in Table 1.
Human factors 5.6. Actual nuclear gauge sources should not be used in this training. If needed, training devices are available that simulate radioactive sources and associated radiation monitoring equipment. An alternative (e.g. for persons who assemble gauges) is to use ‘dummy’ sources that are not radioactive.
Human factors 5.7. Section 13 provides recommendations on training and exercises in emergency preparedness and response.
Human factors 5.8. The security of radioactive material should be an integral part of the training programme for persons working with nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources.
Human factors 5.9. The operating organization should arrange for a programme of refresher training for nuclear gauge personnel to ensure that their knowledge and skills are kept up to date. Such training should include a review of the fundamentals of protection and safety, and information on any changes to safety standards, equipment, policies and procedures, and any changes in regulatory requirements.
Human factors 5.10. The frequency of refresher training should be consistent with regulatory requirements. This refresher training could be combined with other refresher training programmes relevant to the same workers. A typical frequency for refresher training is every three to five years; however, significant changes in regulations or the occurrence of safety issues should be disseminated as written instructions as soon as practicable, and then followed up by inclusion in the next scheduled refresher training.
Human factors 5.11. Written examinations and practical training sessions on the handling of radiation sources in nuclear gauges should be conducted for level 2 personnel (see para. 5.3).
Human factors 6.1. Paragraph 3.99 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 6.2. Paragraph 3.100 of GSR Part 3 [9] states (footnote omitted):
Human factors 6.3. The results of workplace monitoring can be used to indirectly estimate the radiation dose to workers, and this will often be appropriate for many workers in facilities where nuclear gauges are installed. In some situations, however, it will be more appropriate for workers to wear personal dosimeters to directly assess their individual dose. This might be the case for workers performing maintenance on nuclear gauges or workers routinely using portable gauges.
Human factors 6.4. Where individual monitoring is considered appropriate, the operating organization should ensure that radiation doses to designated nuclear gauge personnel are assessed to ensure that doses are kept as low as reasonably achievable and are below the dose limits (see paras 6.5- 6.10). The results from the assessment of doses can also highlight good or bad working practices, faulty equipment, or the degradation of shielding or other engineered safety systems.
Human factors 6.5. Paragraph 3.26 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “The government or the regulatory body shall establish and the regulatory body shall enforce compliance with the dose limits specified in Schedule III [of GSR Part 3] for occupational exposures and public exposures in planned exposure situations.”
Human factors 6.6. Paragraph 3.27 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 6.7. Paragraph 3.28 of GSR Part 3 [9] states (footnote omitted):
Human factors 6.8. Paragraph III.1 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • An effective dose of 20 mSv per year averaged over five consecutive years66 (100 mSv in 5 years) and of 50 mSv in any single year;

  • An equivalent dose to the lens of the eye of 20 mSv per year averaged over five consecutive years (100 mSv in 5 years) and of 50 mSv in any single year;

  • An equivalent dose to the extremities (hands and feet) or to the skin67 of 500 mSv in a year.

Human factors 6.9. Paragraph III.2 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • An effective dose of 6 mSv in a year;

  • An equivalent dose to the lens of the eye of 20 mSv in a year;

  • An equivalent dose to the extremities (hands and feet) or to the skin67 of 150 mSv in a year.

Human factors 6.10. Short term contract workers are subject to the same dose limits as permanently employed workers.
Human factors 6.11. The operating organization should make arrangements with a dosimetry service for the provision of suitable dosimeters to those workers for whom individual dosimetry is considered appropriate, for dose assessment and dose record keeping. The dosimeters should be worn by all workers who are required to regularly enter controlled areas (and also supervised areas, where this is required by national regulations).
Human factors 6.12. The choice of type of dosimeter to be used should be evaluated by the radiation protection officer, possibly in conjunction with a qualified expert in radiation dosimetry. In addition to the need to meet various technical requirements, the choice of dosimeter might also be influenced by considerations of availability, cost and robustness, as well as regulatory requirements.
Human factors 6.13. To ensure that the dosimeter provides an accurate assessment of the effective dose to the worker, the following guidelines should be followed:
  • Dosimeters should be worn by relevant personnel at all times when performing work with radiation sources.

  • Dosimeters should be worn in accordance with the recommendations of the dosimetry service provider.

  • For passive dosimeters (e.g. thermoluminescent, optically stimulated luminescent and film dosimeters), the measuring element should be correctly positioned in the dosimeter holder.

  • The dosimeter should be worn only by the person to whom it is issued.

  • Care should be taken to avoid damaging the measuring element of the dosimeter (dosimeters can be damaged by water, high temperature, high pressure or physical impact).

  • Dosimeters should not be exposed to radiation when not being worn by the worker (the dosimeter should be stored away from sources of radiation when not in use).

  • Passive dosimeters should be promptly processed by the dosimetry service at the end of the period of wear. Dosimeters that have been returned early owing to a suspicion of abnormal exposure should be processed urgently.

  • The dosimetry service should be informed if the operating organization suspects that the dosimeter has been damaged or has been exposed to radiation while the worker to whom it was assigned was not wearing it, in order that the correct dose to be assigned to the worker can be determined.

  • Neutron dosimeters with a suitable neutron energy response should be worn by personnel who receive occupational exposures from working with nuclear gauges containing neutron sources or neutron generators.

Human factors 6.14. Active personal dosimeters are small electronic radiation detectors that emit a warning signal when a pre-set dose rate or dose alarm level is exceeded. Most of these devices also provide a digital display of the cumulative personal dose equivalent. The warning signal is normally an audible alarm, although this can be supplemented by a vibration or a visual signal, which is useful if the ambient noise level is high or if hearing protection devices are being worn.
Human factors 6.15. Active personal dosimeters are a useful tool to warn of high dose rates or to prevent overexposures. They can help to immediately alert workers to problems, hence preventing incidents or mitigating their consequences. The operating organization should consider providing active personal dosimeters especially if procedures that involve the direct handling of sources (such as gauge assembly or maintenance) are to be performed.
Human factors 6.16. Important considerations in relation to the use of active personal dosimeters include the following:
  • Active personal dosimeters should not be used as a replacement for workplace monitoring instruments (e.g. dose rate meters).

  • Active personal dosimeters should be tested periodically in accordance with national recommendations and guidance from the manufacturer.

  • Active personal dosimeters should be calibrated in terms of the radiation fields likely to be encountered in the workplace.

  • Alarm settings of the active personal dosimeters should reflect an appropriate level of dose and/or dose rate and the alarm level should be visible during operation of the device.

  • Changes to active personal dosimeters should not be allowed, except by persons with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

Human factors 6.17. Paragraph 3.103 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that (footnote omitted): “Employers, registrants and licensees shall maintain records of occupational exposure for every worker for whom assessment of occupational exposure is required…”
Human factors 6.18. The operating organization should keep records of doses received by nuclear gauge personnel who regularly enter controlled areas (and also supervised areas, where this is required by national regulations). These records should contain details of the doses recorded by the dosimeters worn by workers. If possible, the records should clearly identify any doses received as a result of incidents or while following emergency procedures, as distinct from doses received during routine work.
Human factors 6.19. The records should reflect the doses recorded by the worker’s primary individual dosimeter issued by the dosimetry service, rather than the doses measured by other devices such as active personal dosimeters.
Human factors 6.20. Paragraph 3.106 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • Shall provide workers with access to records of their own occupational exposure;

  • Shall provide the supervisor of the programme for workers’ health surveillance, the regulatory body and the relevant employer with access to workers’ records of occupational exposure;

  • Shall facilitate the provision of copies of workers’ exposure records to new employers when workers change employment;

  • Shall make arrangements for the retention of exposure records for former workers by the employer, registrant or licensee, as appropriate;

  • Shall, in complying with (a)–(d) above, give due care and attention to maintaining the confidentiality of records.”

Human factors 6.21. Paragraph 3.104 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 6.22. Paragraph 3.107 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
Human factors 6.23. The operating organization is required to conduct an investigation if a radiation dose to a worker or a member of the public exceeds any dose limit or an investigation level specified by the regulatory body or operating organization (Requirement 16 of GSR Part 3 [9]). The investigation should focus on the causes that resulted in the exposure, and on any contributing failures in procedures or safety systems. The investigation report should identify any improvements to procedures or facilities to optimize protection and safety, to reduce the likelihood of a similar event occurring and to mitigate the consequences.
Human factors 6.24. Recommendations on the notification and reporting of incidents are provided in Section 13.
Human factors 6.25. Dosimeters should be of an approved type and should be subjected to periodic quality assurance tests. Personal dosimetry systems should be calibrated periodically (typically every one or two years), with more frequent checks being conducted on the performance of the system. National regulations may require different frequencies of calibration. Recommendations on the testing and calibration of dosimeters and dosimetry equipment are provided in GSG-7 [17].
Human factors 7.1. Paragraph 3.96 of GSR Part 3 [9] states that: “Registrants and licensees … shall establish, maintain and keep under review a programme for workplace monitoring under the supervision of a radiation protection officer or qualified expert.”
Human factors 7.2. The programme for workplace monitoring should be designed to assess the adequacy of the arrangements in place for protection and safety for facilities and activities involving nuclear gauges. The programme should include measurements of dose rate at the following positions:
  • Around storage facilities for gauges and sources, to ensure that an adequate level of shielding is provided;

  • Around gauges during routine operations, to confirm that dose rates remain below any values specified in national regulations or guidance and by the operating organization;

  • Around gauges during maintenance operations, to confirm that the gauge shutter is closed or that the radiation generator is switched off;

  • At the operators’ positions during use of portable gauges, to confirm that radiation levels are acceptable;

  • At the operators’ positions during source loading and unloading operations;

  • At the entrance to a gauge enclosure, to confirm that the gauge shutter is closed or that the radiation generator has ceased to emit radiation;

  • Around the transport package before transporting a portable gauge to and from the site, to confirm the presence of the source;

  • Around vehicles transporting portable gauges before departure to and from the site.

Human factors 7.3. Measurements of radioactive contamination should not normally be necessary; however, such measurements might be appropriate if there is reason to suspect that a sealed source encapsulation has been damaged or is leaking.
Human factors 7.4. The workplace monitoring programme should describe the locations to be monitored, the frequency of monitoring and the records to be kept. This information should be included in the local rules and should also be described in the radiation protection programme. Dose rate investigation levels (see para. 4.29) for each measurement location should be prescribed, and the actions to be taken if these values are exceeded should be specified. Records of the workplace monitoring programme are required to be made available to appropriate persons, including workers and the regulatory body (see paras 2.45 and 3.98 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Human factors 7.5. The operating organization should ensure that a sufficient number of suitable dose rate monitors are made available. While there are many types of monitor for measuring gamma radiation levels, some might not be suitable for accurately measuring low energy photons (e.g. from X ray gauges), which could result in a significant underestimation of the dose rate. Monitors should be calibrated in terms of the radiation fields likely to be encountered in the workplace. Specialized monitoring instruments are necessary for the measurement of beta radiation and for the measurement of neutron radiation. Information and guidance on the suitability of monitors should be obtained from manufacturers and from qualified experts.
Human factors 7.6. The operating organization should arrange for workplace monitoring instruments to be formally tested or calibrated at periodic intervals by a specialized testing laboratory. A number of operating characteristics of the workplace monitoring instrument should be assessed in these tests or calibrations. These operating characteristics include the response to known dose rates at specific energies, the linearity of the response, and the behaviour of the monitor at low dose rates and at very high dose rates. The frequency and the type of tests or calibration, together with the associated record keeping, should comply with regulatory requirements, or else they should be as recommended in appropriate international standards or guidelines. The recommendations of the manufacturer of the workplace monitoring instruments should also be taken into account.
Human factors 7.7. The operating organization should prepare a procedure for undertaking routine operational checks of workplace monitoring instruments. These checks might include physical checks (i.e. of whether the instrument is damaged), battery checks and, if applicable, zeroing of the scale. The response of the monitor to radiation should be checked before use. This can be done, for example, by using a low activity test source of which the characteristics are well known, or by placing the monitor close to the surface of a nuclear gauge housing when the source is in its shielded position. The regulatory body may require that such checks be performed in accordance with formal procedures and that the results be recorded.
Human factors 7.8. Account should also be taken of the environmental conditions in which workplace monitoring instruments are to be used. Some instruments are unsuitable for use in very humid or very hot locations, and some are not robust enough for use on industrial sites. On some sites, special types of workplace monitoring instrument might have to be used. For example, on some petrochemical sites, only monitoring instruments that are designed to minimize the likelihood of accidental ignition of flammable fumes or vapours (‘intrinsically safe monitoring instruments’) are allowed to be used.
Human factors 7.9. Some workplace monitoring instruments are affected by radiofrequency transmissions. If radiation monitoring is to be conducted close to equipment that generates high levels of radiofrequency radiation, then the use of specially designed radiofrequency shielded instruments should be considered.
Human factors 7.10. Account should also be taken of noise levels in the workplace. The audible signals from workplace monitoring instruments should be loud enough to be heard and they should be supplemented by vibration or visible signals, as appropriate.
Human factors 8.1. The Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources [14] applies to all radioactive sources that might pose a significant radiological risk to individuals, society and the environment, and serves as guidance to States on the safety and security of Category 1, 2 and 3 sources.
Human factors 8.2. Sources used in nuclear gauges are generally considered to be Category 3 or Category 4 sources as defined in RS-G-1.9 [3].
Human factors 8.3. The operating organization is required to ensure that sources are kept under proper control (see para. 3.55 of GSR Part 3 [9]). This should apply from the time they are first acquired until they are finally returned to their original supplier or are otherwise safely dealt with at the end of their lifetime.
Human factors 8.4. The operating organization should ensure that it only obtains radioactive sources from authorized suppliers and that disused sources are returned to the original supplier or transferred to another authorized body in accordance with regulatory requirements. The import and export of radioactive sources should be consistent with the recommendations in the Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources [14] and the supplementary guidance on import and export controls [20].
Human factors 8.5. Paragraph 3.53 of GSR Part 3 [9] states:
  • The location and description of each radiation generator or radioactive source for which they are responsible;

  • The activity and form of each radioactive source for which they are responsible.”

Human factors 8.6. As well as maintaining the inventory records described in para. 8.5, the operating organization should conduct periodic accountancy checks of sources, to confirm that they are in their assigned locations and are secure, that any warning signs are visible and that the source details are clearly displayed. National regulations may specify how frequently the accountancy checks need to be conducted, but in general, the following can be applied:
  • Sources in installed gauges should be accounted for at least once per month.

  • Sources in portable gauges should be accounted for every day they are out of the store and once a week when they are in storage.

Human factors 8.7. Sources should only be removed from a source store or moved to another location by trained workers authorized by the operating organization. The workers should log their name, the date and time, and the new location of the source(s). These records should be audited by the radiation protection officer at least once per month, to ensure that all radiation sources are in the correct location. Nuclear gauges that incorporate neutron generators (i.e. containing tritium) should be included in the accountancy procedures for radioactive sources and for radiation generators.
Human factors 8.8. Each radioactive source container should have a lock (or outer locked container or enclosure) designed to prevent unauthorized or accidental removal of the source. Storage facilities are required to be kept locked when containing radioactive sources except when under the direct surveillance of operating personnel (see para. 3.59 of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Human factors 8.9. A gauge containing a disused source should not be disposed of as scrap. It should be forwarded to an authorized facility in accordance with regulatory requirements. Until such transfer is effected, the disused source should be included in the source inventory of the facility and subject to accountancy checks as specified in para. 8.6.
Human factors 8.10. Any suspected loss of control over a radiation source in a nuclear gauge should be promptly investigated by the operating organization; the regulatory body (and any other relevant authority) should be notified, as specified in regulatory requirements and the relevant emergency plans and procedures.
Human factors 9.1. The aim of security measures for radioactive sources is to deter, detect, delay and respond to unauthorized access to the sources. Some radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges have been involved in incidents (see Annex III), and it should be assumed that there could be a significant radiological impact if such sources were to be used for malicious purposes.
Human factors 9.2. The following paragraphs are intended to raise awareness about the security issues that need to be addressed and which are covered in detail in the IAEA Nuclear Security Series publications. In particular, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 14 [21] provides recommendations to States and competent authorities on how to develop or enhance, to implement and to maintain a nuclear security regime for radioactive material, associated facilities and associated activities. IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1) [22] contains more specific guidance to assist States in the development of regulatory requirements for the security of radioactive sources. IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 9-G (Rev. 1) [23] provides guidance on security in the transport of radioactive material.
Human factors 9.3. Safety measures and security measures have in common the aim of protecting human life and health, society and the environment. Safety measures and security measures should be designed and applied in an integrated manner, and as far as possible in a complementary manner, so that security measures do not compromise safety and safety measures do not compromise security.
Human factors 9.4. To ensure that safety measures and security measures are applied in a complementary manner, the government may designate a body responsible for managing the interfaces between safety and security in relation to radioactive sources. Alternatively, a single regulatory body may be assigned responsibility for both the safety and the security of radioactive sources under the national regulatory framework.
Human factors 9.5. In the use of radioactive sources in nuclear gauges, there might be an interface between security measures and safety measures with regard to access to information. For safety purposes, information on the locations and characteristics of radioactive sources and the safety measures in place might need to be readily accessible. However, this information might also be of potential value to an adversary and security considerations may indicate that the confidentiality of some sensitive information needs to be protected. Guidance on the protection and confidentiality of sensitive information is provided in IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 23-G [24]. An appropriate balance needs to be maintained between the availability of information for safety reasons and the need to protect sensitive information for security reasons.
Human factors 9.6. The accidental loss of radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges, which might have security as well as safety implications, is addressed through the control measures described in Section 8. The primary security concerns are the possibility of theft and sabotage of radioactive sources. Effective security measures will address these concerns, and will also provide some inherent benefit by contributing to preventing accidental loss of control.
Human factors 9.7. Safety measures aimed at preventing the loss of radioactive sources, or for general radiation protection purposes, can also provide some benefit against the theft of sources. However, the element of intent involved in theft means that additional security measures might be needed against theft.
Human factors 9.8. IAEA Nuclear Security Series publications provide guidance on how to define the requirements for the security of radioactive sources using a graded approach, based on considerations of threat, the nature of the sources and the relative attractiveness of the material for use in a malicious act. IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1) [22] suggests using the IAEA’s categorization system, set out in RS-G-1.9 [3], in order to assign a particular security level to sources and to help define the necessary security measures. Nuclear gauge sources are typically assigned to security level C. The security measures required for each security function (i.e. deterrence, detection, delay, response, security management) for security level C are described in detail in IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1) [22].
Human factors 9.9. Owing to their portability and the fact that they may be used outside of a secure facility, portable gauges might need additional security measures or procedures to ensure that they remain adequately protected and under control during transport, during use and while they are not in use (i.e. in storage). The specific details of such additional measures will depend on the threat assessment. IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1) [22] also contains illustrative security measures, including those for mobile operation where measures applicable to a fixed installation are not practicable.
Human factors 10.1. The responsibilities of manufacturers and suppliers of radiation generators and radioactive sources, such as those used in nuclear gauges, are established in Requirement 17 of GSR Part 3 [9].
Human factors 10.2. A wide range of radiation sources are used in nuclear gauges, including radioactive sources (emitting beta, gamma or neutron radiation), and X ray and neutron generators. Details are provided in Annexes I and II. The source, nuclear gauge and ancillary equipment should all be obtained from an authorized manufacturer or supplier with an established quality management system such as ISO 9001 [25] or the system described in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 2, Leadership and Management for Safety [26] or an equivalent national standard, to ensure that the design safety features are reproduced consistently.
Human factors 10.3. Nuclear gauges typically consist of several subcomponents that make up a gauging system or installation. The design and operation of these various components are interrelated. Safety should not be compromised by using components that do not meet the original design specifications.
Human factors 10.4. Manufacturers and suppliers of radioactive sources and radiation generators are required to ensure that information on the safe use of the equipment is made available to operating organizations. This information is required to be made available in an appropriate language understandable to users (para. 3.49(c) of GSR Part 3 [9]).
Human factors 10.5. The operating organization should ensure that nuclear gauges and ancillary equipment are not modified without prior assessment of the implications of the modification for protection and safety. The safety assessment should be reviewed by a qualified expert or by the supplier, and it should be verified that the equipment meets the requirements of the regulatory body. It should also be determined whether additional authorization or approval is required.
Human factors 10.6. Permanently installed nuclear gauges should meet the requirements of IEC 62598 [12]. In cases where these requirements are not met (e.g. owing to a special design or unusual application), the operating organization should ensure that the gauge is not used until (a) a safety assessment has been performed by a qualified expert to determine whether any additional safety measures should be implemented and (b) regulatory clearance is obtained for the use of such a gauge.
Human factors 10.7. The main practical elements that can be used to ensure the restriction of radiation exposures are: time, distance, shielding and prevention of access to the radiation beam. Workers should be instructed not to linger in areas where there are high radiation levels, and any work to be undertaken close to a source should be planned so as to be done in the shortest practicable time. Distance from a source of radiation should be increased to the extent possible to reduce the dose rate. A nuclear gauge that meets regulatory requirements will incorporate adequate shielding. The amount of shielding required will be determined by the type and energy of the radiation and the activity of the source. For example, several centimetres of lead could be required around a gamma source in a vessel level gauge, or a few millimetres of aluminium around a beta source in a thickness gauge. The environment in which the gauge will be used should also be considered when deciding on the shielding materials specified in the design (e.g. high temperature or corrosive chemicals could significantly affect some types of shielding).
Human factors 10.8. Nuclear gauges operate by producing a beam of radiation. It is, therefore, necessary to prevent access to this beam, for example by using shutters (manual or automatic), mechanical guarding and/or interlock systems. In some cases the designation of controlled areas might be necessary, for example during maintenance operations, in order to prevent access by unauthorized persons.
Human factors 10.9. In terms of the design of portable gauges, heavy shielding is often impractical, and it is not always possible to utilize interlocked shutters to shield the beam. Therefore, care should be taken to ensure that persons are not exposed to the primary beam. Prevention of access by using physical barriers is not always practicable, and other means should be used, for example by ensuring that the controlled area is under continuous surveillance (e.g. by the gauge operator) and/or by using portable barriers and suitable warning notices.
Human factors 10.10. Beta, gamma and neutron source nuclear gauges contain a sealed radioactive source housed in a shielded container. The source normally remains in the shielded container and is exposed by opening a shielded shutter. Radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges are normally contained within a sealed source capsule. These source capsules should be compatible with the gauge and any relevant ancillary equipment with which they are used, and they should also meet international or equivalent national standards, for example:
  • Source capsules should be designed, manufactured and tested to ensure that they meet the relevant requirements set out in ISO 2919 [11] or an equivalent national standard.

  • In the case of gamma and neutron sources, source capsules should be certified as meeting the requirements for special form radioactive material as established in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-6 (Rev. 1), Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2018 Edition [27].

  • Source capsules should be leak tested in accordance with the requirements set out in ISO 9978 [28] or an equivalent national standard, and there should be a valid leak test certificate that is traceable to each individual source (see also para. 10.31).

  • Source capsules should be marked in accordance with the requirements of ISO 2919 [11] or an equivalent national standard. At a minimum, sources should be marked with the radiation symbol (trefoil) [18] and the word “RADIOACTIVE”. They should also be durably marked with the manufacturer’s serial number.

Human factors 10.11. Some manufacturers specify a recommended working life for a sealed radioactive source. The recommended working life is based on a number of factors, including the half-life of the source, the construction of the source and the impact of the environment in which the source is used. The recommended working life is an indication of the period of time over which the source is expected to retain its integrity.
Human factors 10.12. Manufacturers usually recommend that a source be replaced when it reaches the end of its recommended working life. The regulatory body, however, may agree to the extended use of a source beyond its recommended working life if the source is subjected to more frequent wipe tests or more detailed leakage tests as specified in ISO 9978 [28]. Alternatively, a physical assessment of the condition of the source by a suitably qualified body or expert may be performed to advise about its continued use.
Human factors 10.13. The special form source certificate should be revised and updated at least every five years or as required by national regulations (e.g. see Refs [13, 29]). Updated special form certificates are normally issued by the source manufacturer; however, it is the responsibility of the operating organization (as consignor) to ensure that there is a valid special form certificate for all radioactive sources that are to be transported, in accordance with the requirements of SSR-6 (Rev. 1) [27].
Human factors 10.14. Each radioactive source container or gauge assembly should be permanently and clearly marked with the following details:
  • The international ionizing radiation symbol (trefoil) [18];

  • The word “RADIOACTIVE” in letters not less than 10 mm in height, together with a brief warning in a language appropriate to the country or region of use;

  • The chemical symbol(s) and mass number of the radionuclide(s) for which the device is suitable (e.g. 137Cs or 241Am);

  • The activity of the source(s) on a stated date;

  • The make, model and serial number of the device;

  • The name of the manufacturer and/or distributor of the source.

Human factors 10.15. For portable gauges, the package used during transport should display a durable fireproof label bearing information about the radioactive source that it contains, including the following:
  • The chemical symbol and mass number of the radionuclide(s);

  • The activity of the source(s) on a stated date;

  • The identification number of the sealed source(s);

  • The name of the manufacturer.

Human factors 10.16. A neutron generator is a compact linear accelerator of deuterium nuclei, which produces 14 MeV neutrons. Its components include the accelerator tube (neutron tube), a target normally containing tritium, a high voltage power supply and a measurement module.
Human factors 10.17. Neutron generators are used for determining the concentration of a number of elements that can be excited through different neutron techniques (inelastic scattering, thermal capture, neutron activation). This technique is used in the coal industry and the cement industry.
Human factors 10.18. Shielding materials of low atomic number are normally the most cost effective and practical approach for reducing the dose rates around neutron generators. An example shielding calculation for neutron generators is provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-57, Radiation Safety in Well Logging [6]. The geometry of the shielding should be designed to restrict the exposure of the workers undertaking the calibrations due to scattered neutron radiation. The maximum dose rate on the exterior of the shielded neutron generator should be within the limits stipulated by the regulatory body.
Human factors 10.19. Gamma radiation is emitted both during neutron generation (from inelastic interaction of high energy neutrons) and for some time after the generator is turned off (from capture of thermal neutrons and the subsequent radioactive decay of neutron activation products). If significant dose rates remain after the generator is switched off, a holding time to allow for the decay of activation products will be necessary.
Human factors 10.20. In some cases, neutron generators can accumulate radioactive contamination due to neutron activation of loose material on the outer surfaces of the neutron tube. In such cases, appropriate personal protective equipment should be worn by workers when handling the generator. Checks for contamination should be conducted periodically (at least once a year), upon receiving and shipping out the neutron generator, and before the repair of the neutron generator.
Human factors 10.21. An advantage of nuclear gauges using X ray generators is that when they are switched off the emission of radiation ceases immediately. However, in many nuclear gauges, the X ray generator normally remains on and the X ray beam is controlled by a shutter. This shutter should be interlocked, so that any attempt to access the X ray beam (e.g. by opening an access door) will cause the X ray tube to automatically and immediately switch off. The shutter should be fitted with safety features such that it cannot be unintentionally opened.
Human factors 10.22. The maximum dose rate in accessible locations close to the tube housing when the shutter is closed should be within the limits specified by the regulatory body.
Human factors 10.23. The gauge should be fitted with an illuminated warning sign that is activated when the X ray equipment is energized. The status of the shutter (i.e. open or closed) should also be indicated by an illuminated sign. These signs should be legible and readily discernible from all accessible sides of the X ray equipment.
Human factors 10.24. Under normal operating conditions it should not be possible for workers operating X ray equipment to expose any part of the body to the primary X ray beam. If it is suspected that such an exposure has occurred, appropriate emergency response action (see Section 13) should be initiated immediately. Attention should also be paid to any scattered radiation.
Human factors 10.25. Special maintenance procedures, such as beam alignments or other adjustments, should not be performed unless measures designed to prevent exposure of the eye or other parts of the body to the primary beam have been implemented. If it is necessary to operate the X ray equipment with a safety interlock deactivated, this procedure should be approved by the regulatory body. All such special procedures should be undertaken by persons with appropriate training and under the supervision of a radiation protection officer. In addition, the number of persons working with the X ray equipment while it is energized should be the minimum necessary to perform the procedure safely. During such procedures, when the X ray equipment is energized, access of non-essential personnel to the location of the X ray equipment should be prevented by physical barriers. A sign warning of the operations in progress should be placed at the access points to the area.
Human factors 10.26. Source changers should be used for the safe exchange of old and new radioactive sources. Normally, these are shipping containers used by the source supplier or gauge maintenance company to send a new source to the operator, facilitate the exchange and return the old source to the supplier or another authorized organization. When they are not in use, sealed sources should be safely stored in storage containers and unauthorized access to the source containers should be prevented. When source changers are used as transport containers, the consignor should ensure that source changers are transported in compliance with the requirements of SSR-6 (Rev. 1) [27].
Human factors 10.27. Containers used for storing or exchanging radioactive sources from nuclear gauges should be designed to meet the applicable national safety standards. Such containers should include a lock or should have an outer locked container designed to prevent unauthorized or accidental removal of the sealed source from its shielded position. Storage containers and source changers should be kept locked (with the key removed at all times) when they contain sealed sources, unless they are under the direct surveillance of an authorized worker.
Human factors 10.28. There will be occasions when radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges need to be stored. Examples include: portable gauges not in use; gauges removed from a production line during maintenance; new gauges awaiting installation and old gauges awaiting disposal.
Human factors 10.29. To ensure the safety and security of the radioactive sources the storage facility should:
  • Provide adequate shielding.

  • Be physically secure (e.g. locked when not in use).

  • Be a dedicated enclosure that is used exclusively for storage of nuclear gauges and associated radioactive sources, and is not used as a general storage area for other goods.

  • Be fireproof and not contain other hazardous materials (e.g. flammable, explosive, toxic or corrosive substances). Such hazardous material should not be stored near the storage facility for radioactive sources.

  • Be protected from environmental conditions that might adversely affect the integrity of the gauges.

  • Be appropriately labelled (e.g. with the radiation symbol [18] and warning notices in the local language).

Human factors 10.30. Some nuclear gauges are installed or used in locations where environmental conditions can result in the protection and safety of the gauge being adversely affected; for example, shielding might be degraded, shutters might become stuck or warning notices might become illegible. Nuclear gauges should be subject to a routine preventive maintenance schedule. Persons performing the maintenance work should be made aware of the radiation hazards and should be appropriately trained. When working close to a nuclear gauge, a radiation monitor should always be used to confirm that any shutters are fully closed and that the source is adequately shielded.
Human factors 10.31. When a new radioactive source is purchased it should be supplied with a certificate confirming that there is no leakage of radioactive material. Periodic tests should be performed in accordance with the procedure specified in ISO 9978 [28] by an appropriately trained and qualified person to ensure that the structure of the source remains intact. The intervals for leak testing should not normally exceed two years, and will normally be specified by the regulatory body. Radioactive sources in gauges that are used under harsh industrial conditions (e.g. high temperature, corrosive chemicals, high levels of vibration) might need to be tested more frequently.
Human factors 10.32. As stated in para. 3.60 of GSR Part 3 [9], the operating organization: “shall ensure that arrangements are made promptly for the safe management of and control over radiation generators and radioactive sources, including appropriate financial provision, once it has been decided to take them out of use.”
Human factors 10.33. When a nuclear gauge is no longer used, and there are no plans to use it again in the foreseeable future, the gauge should be formally taken out of use and arrangements made for it to be removed from the site. All disused radiation sources should be managed in a manner that is consistent with the national regulatory framework and, if necessary, is subject to approval by the regulatory body. This should include the following:
  • Radioactive sources (including calibration sources, as applicable) and radiation generators should, subject to approval by the regulatory body, be transferred to an authorized organization for safe disposal. If possible, the operating organization should return the source or generator to the original supplier; alternatively, the operating organization may take another action as authorized by the regulatory body. Comprehensive records should be kept by the operating organization of all authorizations for the storage, transfer or disposal of radioactive sources (including any certificates provided by recipients or by disposal facilities for radioactive waste). The relevant records should be maintained as specified by the regulatory body.

  • The operating organization should return disused neutron generators to the original supplier. Otherwise, the generator should be made inoperable and, subject to approval by the regulatory body, transferred to an authorized organization for safe disposal (i.e. of the tritium source).

  • In cases where all radiation sources are to be removed from the facility, all radiation symbols (trefoils) and other relevant notices should be removed from the facility and a workplace monitoring survey (see Section 7) should be conducted by the radiation protection officer or a qualified expert to provide additional confirmation that the radioactive sources have been removed from the site. A final decommissioning plan should be prepared in advance, which includes the final radiation survey and details of the storage, transfer or disposal of sources of radiation. The final decommissioning plan is required to be submitted to the regulatory body for review and approval (see Requirement 11 of IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 6, Decommissioning of Facilities [30]). Further recommendations are provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-49, Decommissioning of Medical, Industrial and Research Facilities [31].

  • The operating organization should inform the relevant authorities when all sources of radiation have been removed from the site.

  • Radioactive waste should be managed in accordance with recommendations provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-45, Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from the Use of Radioactive Material in Medicine, Industry, Agriculture, Research and Education [32] or an equivalent national standard, and in accordance with regulatory requirements.

  • An option for disposal of sealed sources in nuclear gauges is borehole disposal. Recommendations on borehole disposal facilities are provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-1, Borehole Disposal Facilities for Radioactive Waste [33]. A technical manual on borehole disposal of disused sealed sources is provided in Ref. [34].

Human factors 10.34. In the case of old nuclear gauge systems, it is possible that the manufacturer and/or original supplier is no longer in business. If this is the case, decommissioning and disposal of the old sources should be arranged in accordance with the requirements specified by the regulatory body.
Human factors 10.35. During decommissioning (or even during the operation of the nuclear gauge facility), if the operating organization discovers a source in its possession for which there are no records to confirm that it is subject to an authorization issued by the regulatory body, such a source should be deemed to be out of regulatory control. If this is the case, the operating organization should check that the situation is safe (i.e. following its own emergency plan; see Section 13) and notify the regulatory body. Guidance on a national strategy for managing such sources is provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-19, National Strategy for Regaining Control Over Orphan Sources and Improving Control Over Vulnerable Sources [35].
Human factors 11.1 Where a portable nuclear gauge is to be used on the premises of a client rather than on the premises of the operating organization, the client should be consulted on the preparation and planning of the work. This should include agreeing the location and time for the work with the gauge to be performed. Any specific measures for protection and safety of persons on the site should be discussed between the parties, to avoid possible confusion on the site, while remaining consistent with regulatory requirements.
Human factors 11.2. The gauge users should be made aware of any hazards on the site where the work is planned. Any permit-to-work systems or other site safety procedures implemented by the client should be followed. The client should be provided with a copy of the operating organization’s local rules and emergency plans and procedures.
Human factors 11.3. The operating organization and the client should agree on the planned timescale of the work and the duration of the period over which nuclear gauge work will be performed. The client should allow sufficient time for the nuclear gauge work to be performed safely.
Human factors 11.4. The operating organization should inform the client about the radiation source(s) that it is planning to use on the site and the associated hazard. It should ensure that proper storage facilities are arranged in advance for any nuclear gauges that it intends to store on the site overnight (this might require separate authorization by the regulatory body). (See also paras 11.12–11.15).
Human factors 11.5. Work should only be performed on site when the gauge and any necessary items of ancillary equipment are in good working order. If any faults are found, the equipment should not be used until a suitable replacement is provided or a repair is made.
Human factors 11.6. Work with mobile nuclear gauges should be performed in an area designated as either a controlled area or a supervised area, based on the criteria described in Section 4. Normally other workers should be excluded from this area.
Human factors 11.7. The regulatory body may specify the maximum permitted dose rate around the area where mobile nuclear gauges are used, typical values being in the range 2.5–20 μSv/h. It is often practicable to achieve a dose rate at the boundary that is below 1 μSv/h.
Warning notices 11.8. Notices should be displayed at suitable positions on the boundary of the controlled area, as appropriate. The notices should bear the radiation symbol [18], warnings and appropriate instructions in a language understood by persons working on the site.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.9. The immediate area around a portable nuclear gauge (controlled area) should be cleared of all persons except for the gauge operator. Before using the gauge, the operator should confirm that there are no unauthorized persons within the immediate area.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.10. Dose rates should be measured around the gauge during a test exposure (or during the first exposure, depending on the circumstances) to confirm that it is correctly designated and that any barriers are correctly positioned.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.11. The workers operating portable nuclear gauges should be suitably trained and be familiar with the equipment, its modes of operation and its potential problems. The workers should also have an understanding of the radiation source, its radiation safety aspects, the manner in which it is operated, and the necessary precautions during any source handling or gauge maintenance procedures such as shutter cleaning.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.12. Portable nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources might, if necessary, be stored on the site overnight or between operations. The need for such storage should be identified in the planning phase, and arrangements should be made with the client for the provision of suitable storage facilities that comply with regulatory requirements.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.13. On-site storage facilities should consist of a lockable room, purpose-built store or storage pit to which access is controlled. On-site storage facilities should provide the same level of protection and safety and security as storage facilities at the operating organization’s main base. A suitable storage facility should provide protection from the prevailing environmental conditions and should also provide an adequate level of safety and security. The storage facility should be weatherproof and resistant to fire. The storage facility should be located at a remote distance from any other hazardous materials such as explosives.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.14. The storage facility should be built of materials that provide sufficient shielding (if needed) to reduce dose rates outside the storage facility to levels specified by the regulatory body. The storage facility should be designated as a controlled area or supervised area, as appropriate.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.15. The door to the storage facility should be kept locked and the keys should be held only by authorized personnel. Keys should be of specific design that cannot be easily reproduced. A warning notice incorporating the radiation symbol [18] and emergency contact number should be displayed on the door. It is good practice to have two separate locks with different keys on the door to the storage facility, with the two keys being kept by two different persons.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.16. On completion of the work with portable nuclear gauges, workers should use a workplace monitoring instrument to confirm that each gauge can be safely transported from the site.
Supervising and monitoring the area 11.17. Before leaving the site, the workers should conduct a visual examination to ensure that equipment has not been damaged. Portable gauges should be made ready for transport by placing them in the proper transport containers (see Section 12). The container should be securely stowed in the vehicle to avoid damage during transport.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.1. Nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources will need to be transported:
  • From the gauge supplier to the operating organization’s facility;

  • From the operating organization’s facility to the authorized site of operation in the case of portable gauges;

  • From the operating organization’s facility to the supplier or other suitably authorized facility at the end of the useful life of the source, if it has become disused for some other reason, or following an accident involving the source.

Supervising and monitoring the area 12.2. The transport of radioactive sources used in nuclear gauges should conform to national regulations and the requirements of SSR-6 (Rev. 1) [27].
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.3 Where applicable, consideration should also be given to binding international instruments for specific modes of transport, such as the Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air of the International Civil Aviation Organization [36], and the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code of the International Maritime Organization [37]. Regional agreements such as the European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road [38], the Agreement of Partial Reach to Facilitate the Transport of Dangerous Goods signed by the Governments of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay [39], and the European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways [40], as appropriate, may also apply.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.4. When portable nuclear gauges are to be moved within a site, they should be kept in the storage facility until they are to be moved to the new location.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.5. The gauge should be moved only in the container provided by the manufacturer, and this should be locked and the keys should be removed. The container should be kept under surveillance for the duration of the movement on the site. The keys of the container should be kept by the authorized gauge operator.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.6. When a portable nuclear gauge (or portable source from an installed gauge) is to be transported to another site, it should be kept in the storage facility until it is to be moved.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.7. The gauge (or portable source) should be transported only in the container provided by the manufacturer for transport purposes, and this should be locked and the keys should be removed.
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.8. SSR-6 (Rev. 1) [27] assigns responsibilities for the transport of radioactive material to the following:
  • The consignor (the person or organization that prepares a consignment for transport);

  • The carrier (the person or organization that undertakes transport of radioactive material);

  • The consignee (the person or organization that receives a consignment).

Supervising and monitoring the area 12.9. The transport of radioactive material is a complex activity, and a comprehensive overview of the requirements of SSR-6 (Rev. 1) is outside the scope of this Safety Guide. Guidance on how to meet these requirements is provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-26 (Rev, 1), Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2018 Edition) [41].
Supervising and monitoring the area 12.10. Comprehensive guidance on nuclear security in the transport of radioactive material is provided in IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 9-G (Rev. 1) [23].
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.1. The requirements for an adequate level of preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency are established in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 7, Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency [42]. An emergency is:
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.2. A nuclear or radiological emergency is:
  • The energy resulting from a nuclear chain reaction or from the decay of the products of a chain reaction; or

  • Radiation exposure” [8].

Supervising and monitoring the area 13.3. Incidents involving nuclear gauges have occurred as a result of operator error or equipment failure; some examples are provided in Annex III. Incidents involving nuclear gauges have included the following:
  • Jammed or broken shutters;

  • Other mechanical damage to gauges (e.g. crushing);

  • Abnormal (i.e. higher than expected) dose rates;

  • Missing sources;

  • Leaking sources due to mechanical impact, fire or corrosion;

  • Malevolent actions such as theft of nuclear gauges (especially portable gauges).

Supervising and monitoring the area 13.4. In many cases, incidents involving nuclear gauges can be prevented or their consequences can be mitigated if the following precautions are taken:
  • Nuclear gauges and associated equipment should meet current regulatory standards.

  • Workers:

    1. Should be properly trained and qualified, and they should be competent;

    2. Should follow the local rules and other relevant procedures;

    3. Should use calibrated workplace monitoring instruments and, if appropriate, wear suitable personal dosimeters before, during and after every source use, and in accordance with the radiation protection programme (see Section 4);

    4. Should undertake regular and appropriate inspections of equipment before use;

    5. Should make proper use of emergency equipment.

  • Should be properly trained and qualified, and they should be competent;

  • Should follow the local rules and other relevant procedures;

  • Should use calibrated workplace monitoring instruments and, if appropriate, wear suitable personal dosimeters before, during and after every source use, and in accordance with the radiation protection programme (see Section 4);

  • Should undertake regular and appropriate inspections of equipment before use;

  • Should make proper use of emergency equipment.

Supervising and monitoring the area 13.5. Although the prevention of incidents is the first priority, events could still occur that would necessitate protective actions or other response actions. The operating organization is required to have an emergency plan and procedures prepared in advance for the goals of emergency response to be achieved and for the emergency response to be effective (see Requirement 23 of GSR Part 7 [42]).
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.6. The hazards associated with sources used in nuclear gauges and the potential consequences of an emergency need to be assessed to provide a basis for establishing arrangements for emergency preparedness and response, in accordance with Requirement 4 of GSR Part 7 [42]. Potential emergencies that could affect workers, members of the public or the environment should be identified in the operating organization’s hazard assessment.
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.7. Emergency preparedness category IV, as described in Table 1 of GSR Part 7 [42], generally applies to nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources. Appropriate emergency arrangements (including plans, procedures, equipment, training, drills, exercises and a quality management programme) that correspond to this category are required to be established. Further recommendations are provided in IAEA Safety Standards Series Nos GS-G-2.1, Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency [43], and GSG-2, Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency [44].
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.8. The emergency plans for nuclear gauges should address scenarios such as a missing or lost source, the theft of a source, damage to a gauge producing increased dose rates, damage to a source leading to contamination and failure of a safety system leading to the exposure of persons. Emergency procedures should include the following:
  • A clear statement of roles and responsibilities;

  • A concept of operations;

  • Communication and coordination arrangements;

  • Protocols for notification of an emergency;

  • Instructions to site personnel;

  • Instructions for delineation of the affected area and access control;

  • Measures to protect emergency workers.

Supervising and monitoring the area 13.9. Recommendations on developing adequate emergency arrangements at the organizational, local and national levels on a step by step basis including templates for emergency plans are provided in GS-G-2.1 [43]. Further practical guidance regarding generic procedures for assessment and response during a radiological emergency is provided in Ref. [45]. Action guides for dealing with radiological emergencies are provided in Ref. [46].
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.10. Emergency arrangements can be regarded as comprising several tasks, each of which should be addressed by the operating organization and relevant response organizations, in accordance with the recommendations provided in GS-G-2.1 [43] for facilities and activities in emergency preparedness category IV.
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.11. Implementation of the on-site emergency plans and procedures may require off-site support (e.g. off-site response organization, emergency services, radiation protection specialists, law enforcement authorities in the event of theft of source) as addressed in GSR Part 7 [42] and GS-G-2.1 [43]. The on-site emergency plan should provide details of any off-site support, and it should be ensured that responders are fully aware of and accept their responsibilities. In particular, the on-site emergency plan should specify the arrangements for immediate and efficient communication between all the parties involved.
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.12. The operating organization is required to submit its emergency plan to the regulatory body for approval, when applying for an authorization (para. 6.19 of GSR Part 7 [42]). The operating organization should also make the emergency plan and associated procedures available to the appropriate off-site authorities.
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.13. The operating organization is required to ensure that all necessary tools, instruments, supplies, equipment, communication systems, facilities and documentation for responding to emergencies are made available and are under the control of a quality management programme that includes inventory control, testing and calibration (see para. 6.34 of GSR Part 7 [42]).
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.14. For emergencies involving nuclear gauges, consideration should be given to the need for the following equipment, as appropriate:
  • Appropriate workplace monitoring instruments to measure both high and low dose rates;

  • Active personal dosimeters;

  • Barrier materials and warning notices for the temporary designation of a controlled area;

  • If appropriate, suitable local shielding, such as blanking plates to shield the primary beam in the event of the shutter being stuck in the open position;

  • Forceps or remote handling tongs, and a spare source container with adequate shielding;

  • Wipe test kit for leak testing sources and for other surface contamination checks;

  • Communication equipment (e.g. portable phones);

  • Spare batteries and torches.

Supervising and monitoring the area 13.15. If it is suspected that a sealed source capsule might have been damaged, extra care should be taken, as radioactive material could leak out of the source and there could be a risk of contaminating people and objects in the vicinity. The detection and measurement of radioactive contamination from the leaking source involve specialized monitoring equipment and expertise. If it is known or suspected that a source capsule has ruptured, the operating organization should promptly seek advice and assistance from a qualified expert. Adequate consideration should be given to the decontamination of persons and equipment, as appropriate, in such instances. Furthermore, the operating organization might seek assistance from the manufacturer or supplier.
Supervising and monitoring the area 13.16. Paragraphs 13.17–13.20 provide practical guidance on the immediate actions to be taken by workers and by the radiation protection officer when an incident involving a nuclear gauge occurs. Although the actions are listed in the sequence in which they can be expected to be performed, it might be necessary to implement the actions in a different sequence depending on the actual circumstances of the incident. The operating organization should develop emergency procedures taking account of the recommendations provided in this section and the postulated accident scenarios based on the hazard assessment. As with any radiological emergency, the first priority of the emergency response should be the protection of persons.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources 13.17. In the case of an event involving a nuclear gauge containing a radioactive source, workers should undertake the following actions:
  • Quickly recognize an abnormal situation that might constitute an emergency and implement the appropriate emergency procedures.

  • Remain calm and move away from the gauge and ensure that any other workers in the vicinity are evacuated and informed that there might be an emergency.

  • Inform the radiation protection officer of the operating organization.

  • Measure the dose rates and record any doses measured by active personal dosimeters, if these have been worn.

  • Confirm, establish or re-establish controlled area barriers on the basis of dose rate reference levels consistent with regulatory requirements and the emergency plan and procedures.

  • Prevent access to the controlled area.

  • Use necessary personal protective equipment.

  • Maintain surveillance of the controlled area.

  • Inform the relevant authorities (and the client, if the emergency occurs at the client’s site) and seek assistance as prescribed in the emergency plan and procedures.

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radioactive sources 13.18. In the case of an event involving a nuclear gauge containing a radioactive source, the radiation protection officer should undertake the following actions:
  • Implement a specific course of action on the basis of previously established emergency plans and procedures, taking care to minimize doses that might be received as a result of this course of action.

  • Move to a location away from the controlled area and rehearse the planned course of action before entering the controlled area to implement the emergency plan.

  • Implement the planned course of action to the extent that training, equipment, the actual situation and authorizations allow; under no circumstances should the source come into contact with the hands or other parts of the body.

  • If the course of action taken is unsuccessful, leave the controlled area and consider the next course of action while maintaining surveillance of the controlled area.

  • Call for technical assistance, if necessary, from a qualified expert or from the manufacturer of the source and/or the gauging equipment, as appropriate. Such assistance may form part of the emergency plan and procedures, in which case it should be planned and agreed upon between the various parties in advance.

  • When the situation is brought under control and the source is safe, investigate the incident and estimate any doses received.

  • If personal dosimeters were worn, return these to the dosimetry service for rapid assessment.

  • Arrange for any damaged or malfunctioning equipment to be repaired by the manufacturer or a qualified expert before any reuse.

  • Prepare a report and notify the regulatory body, in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.19. In the case of an event involving a nuclear gauge containing a radiation generator, workers should undertake the following actions:
  • Quickly recognize an abnormal situation that might constitute an emergency.

  • Turn off the electrical power to the generator.

  • Inform the radiation protection officer of what has happened.

  • Perform a radiation survey to determine whether there is any residual radiation hazard.

  • Not move any equipment until details such as position, beam direction and exposure settings (tube voltage, current and time) have been recorded.

  • Not use the gauge until it has been examined and repaired by the manufacturer or by a qualified expert.

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.20. In the case of an event involving a nuclear gauge containing a radiation generator, the radiation protection officer should undertake the following actions:
  • Estimate the doses that could have been received.

  • If personal dosimeters were worn, return these to the dosimetry service for rapid assessment.

  • Prepare a report and notify the regulatory body, in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.21. In accordance with para. 5.44 of GSR Part 7 [42], all personnel who will participate in implementing the emergency response actions are required to be adequately qualified and trained for the effective fulfilment of their roles. This should include familiarization with and understanding of the emergency plan, together with specific training on the application of emergency procedures and on the use of emergency equipment. This is also required to include guidance and training on the approximate radius of any inner cordoned off area in which urgent protective actions would initially be taken and on the adjustment of this area on the basis of observed or assessed conditions on the site.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.22. Individual workers should implement only those parts of the emergency plan for which they have been authorized and trained and for which they have the appropriate equipment. Provisions for training should be reviewed periodically to ensure the continued proficiency of workers.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.23. Emergency exercises should be held to test critical components of the emergency plan, at intervals that are commensurate with the potential hazard. Small scale exercises should be held frequently to ensure that the contact details of persons and organizations with responsibilities in the emergency response are up to date.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.24. Any lessons identified from exercises are required to be fed back into reviews and, as necessary, revisions of the emergency plans and procedures (see para. 6.36 of GSR Part 7 [42]).
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.25. Formal reviews of the emergency plan should be undertaken periodically. Such reviews should include provisions to update the emergency plan in response to lessons from exercises or from emergencies.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.26. The primary objective of emergency preparedness and response is to mitigate the consequences of emergencies. To achieve this, incidents that have occurred should be critically reviewed so that the lessons identified can be used to provide feedback for improving equipment, maintenance procedures, operating procedures and emergency arrangements. A comprehensive report that includes an analysis of the emergency and the emergency response should be prepared.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.27. The report on an incident involving nuclear gauges should be prepared by the radiation protection officer with the assistance of qualified experts if necessary. Such reports should be submitted to senior management, the regulatory body and other relevant authorities at local, regional or national level. If the incident could have been caused by an equipment malfunction, the supplier and the regulatory body should be notified so that the equipment can be evaluated and appropriate action taken.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.28. The report on an emergency should include the following:
  • A description of the emergency, with as much detail as possible of the equipment involved. The details should include model numbers and serial numbers wherever possible.

  • Environmental conditions at the time of the emergency, with particular reference to whether or not these conditions played any significant part in causing the emergency or affecting the outcome.

  • The specific cause(s) of the emergency.

  • Details of actions taken to regain control of the situation and to restore conditions to normal, with special reference to any actions that were notably beneficial or detrimental.

  • The personnel involved and their duties, tasks and qualifications.

  • An assessment and summary of the doses received by all affected individuals.

  • Corrective actions recommended with the aim of preventing similar emergencies in the future.

  • Lessons from managing the emergency.

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators 13.29. Communication with the public on emergencies involving nuclear gauges (for example, in the event of a gauge being lost or stolen) should be conducted by the appropriate department of the operating organization in discussion with the regulatory body and other relevant authorities as specified in the emergency plan and procedures. Requirements 10 and 13 of GSR Part 7 [42] address arrangements for communication with the public; further recommendations on keeping the public informed are provided in GS-G-2.1 [43].
  • EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Fundamental Safety Principles, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF-1, IAEA, Vienna (2006).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Technical Data on Nucleonic Gauges, IAEA-TECDOC-1459, IAEA, Vienna (2005).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Categorization of Radioactive Sources, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1.9, IAEA, Vienna (2005).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Radiation Safety of Gamma, Electron and X Ray Irradiation Facilities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-8, IAEA, Vienna (2010).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-11, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Radiation Safety in Well Logging, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-57, IAEA, Vienna.

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Radiation Safety of Accelerator Based Radioisotope Production Facilities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-59, IAEA, Vienna.

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, IAEA Safety Glossary: Terminology used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, 2018 Edition, IAEA, Vienna (2019).

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, IAEA, Vienna (2014).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 1 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (2016).

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, Radiological Protection — Sealed Radioactive Sources: General Requirements and Classification, ISO 2919:2012, ISO, Geneva (2012).

  • INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Nuclear Instrumentation – Constructional Requirements and Classification of Radiometric Gauges, IEC 62598:2011.

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Inspection of Radiation Sources and Regulatory Enforcement, IAEA-TECDOC-1526, IAEA, Vienna (2007).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources, IAEA, Vienna (2004).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Safety Assessment for Facilities and Activities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 4 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (2016).

  • INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 103, Elsevier Science, Oxford (2007).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, Occupational Radiation Protection, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-7, IAEA, Vienna (2018).

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, Basic Ionizing Radiation Symbol, ISO 361:1975, ISO, Geneva (1975).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Training in Radiation Protection and the Safe Use of Radiation Sources, Safety Reports Series No. 20, IAEA, Vienna (2001).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Guidance on the Import and Export of Radioactive Sources, IAEA, Vienna (2012).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Nuclear Security Recommendations on Radioactive Material and Associated Facilities, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 14, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Security of Radioactive Material in Use and Storage and of Associated Facilities, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (2019).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Security of Radioactive Material in Transport, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 9-G (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (2020).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Security of Nuclear Information, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 23-G, IAEA, Vienna (2015).

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, Quality Management Systems: Requirements, ISO 9001:2015, ISO, Geneva (2015).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Leadership and Management for Safety, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 2, IAEA, Vienna (2016).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2018 Edition, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-6 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (2018).

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, Radiation Protection — Sealed Sources - Leakage Test Methods, ISO 9978:2020, ISO, Geneva (2020).

  • NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Qualification of Special Form Radioactive Material, 10 CFR 71.75, US Govt Printing Office, Washington DC (2015).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Decommissioning of Facilities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 6, IAEA, Vienna (2014).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Decommissioning of Medical, Industrial and Research Facilities, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-49, IAEA, Vienna (2019).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from the Use of Radioactive Material in Medicine, Industry, Agriculture, Research and Education, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-45, IAEA, Vienna (2019).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Borehole Disposal Facilities for Radioactive Waste, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-1, IAEA, Vienna (2009).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, BOSS: Borehole Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources — A Technical Manual, IAEA-TECDOC-1644, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, National Strategy for Regaining Control Over Orphan Sources and Improving Control Over Vulnerable Sources, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-19, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  • INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION, Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2017–2018 Edition, ICAO, Montreal (2017).

  • INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, IMDG Code: International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, 2018 Edition, IMO, London (2018).

  • UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE, INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), 2021 Edition, UNECE, Geneva (2020).

  • The MERCOSUR/MERCOSUL Agreement of Partial Reach to Facilitate the Transport of Dangerous Goods (1994).

  • UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE, INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN), 2021 Edition, UNECE, Geneva (2020).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2018 Edition), IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-26 (Rev. 1), IAEA, Vienna (in preparation.)

  • FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, INTERPOL, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, PREPARATORY COMMISSION FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE NUCLEAR-TEST-BAN TREATY ORGANIZATION, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION, Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 7, IAEA, Vienna (2015).

  • FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-2.1, IAEA, Vienna (2007).

  • FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Generic Procedures for Assessment and Response during a Radiological Emergency, IAEA-TECDOC-1162, IAEA, Vienna (2000). [46] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Method for Developing Arrangements for Response to a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, EPR-Method 2003, IAEA, Vienna (2003).

Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators I-1. Nuclear gauges incorporate a radioactive source or a radiation generator. Table I–1 presents examples of nuclear gauges used for various applications, including typical sources, their activities and the corresponding D values in accordance with IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards [I–1], and Table I–2 provides examples of nuclear gauges systems used in manufacturing industries.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators a n.a.: not applicable.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators a XRF: X ray fluorescence.
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators [I–1] EUROPEAN COMMISSION, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, IAEA, Vienna (2014).
Actions to be taken for events involving nuclear gauges containing radiation generators II-1. To prepare a safety assessment for normal operational conditions and foreseeable incident scenarios, the associated hazards and control measures need to be considered and documented.
Normal operating conditions II–2. For nuclear gauges, normal operating conditions include the following:
  • Installation of gauges;

  • Operation of gauges;

  • Transport of portable gauges;

  • Work at the client’s site with portable gauges;

  • Maintenance of gauges;

  • Disposal of disused sources and gauges.

Normal operating conditions II–3. For each of the above operating conditions, the hazards involved and the necessary control measures need to be identified.
Reasonably foreseeable incidents II–4. A set of reasonably foreseeable incidents are to be used as the postulated scenarios that are to be considered in the safety assessment, and for which appropriate safety measures are to be identified and implemented. The list of reasonably foreseeable incidents for nuclear gauges includes the following:
  • Neutron generator or X ray generator failing to de-energize when operation is terminated;

  • Loss of shielding resulting in increased dose rates;

  • Damaged source resulting in the spread of radioactive contamination;

  • Missing, lost or stolen radioactive source;

  • Leaking source (e.g. as detected by a routine leak test);

  • Failure of a safety system (e.g. warning lights, shutter mechanisms);

  • Fire or explosion (work area, storage area, during transport);

  • Incidents during special procedures (installation, maintenance, calibration, removal);

  • Damaged transport container (for portable gauges);

  • Accident during movement or transport of portable gauges containing radioactive material.

Reasonably foreseeable incidents II–5. The elements to be considered in the safety assessment for each of these scenarios are discussed below.
Hazards External radiation hazards
Hazards II–6. The nature of the external radiation hazard and the associated control measures will depend on the type of radiation emitted by the radiation sources in the gauge, as shown in Table II–1.
Hazards II–7. In terms of the sources listed in Table II–1:
  • The beta sources will give rise to bremsstrahlung radiation.

  • Some 241Am gamma sources produce neutron radiation.

  • The neutron sources will give rise to gamma radiation.

Hazards II–8. Gauges containing radiation generators will produce an external radiation hazard due to X rays or neutron radiation. Neutron generators will also give rise to gamma radiation.
Hazards Internal radiation hazards
Hazards II–9. There is potential for internal exposure if a sealed source were to be damaged. Beta sources, in particular, can be easily damaged. For gamma and neutron sources, damage is much less likely owing to the use of special form radioactive material. However, in a severe accident or owing to severe environmental conditions, even these sources might be ruptured, giving rise to potential internal exposure.
Hazards Who would be exposed to the hazards?
Hazards II­–10. Consideration is to be given to the following persons:
  • Workers: Gauge operators, gauge maintenance personnel and other personnel present in the area.

  • Members of the public, including visitors to the site.

Control measures Engineered controls
Control measures II–11. Consideration is to be given to the following engineered controls:
  • Safety incorporated in the design of the sealed source, the gauge and the gauging system as a whole;

  • Shielding provided by the gauge and any associated containers;

  • Demarcation of the gauge area with barriers and warning signs;

  • Safety and warning systems (shutters, interlocks, warning lights and other signals);

  • Design of special handling tools (for installation, maintenance and emergency procedures).

Control measures Administrative controls
Control measures II–12. Consideration is to be given to the following administrative controls:
  • Safe working procedures, including local rules and permit-to-work systems;

  • Staff training;

  • Appointment of radiation protection officer(s);

  • Obtaining advice from a qualified expert;

  • Establishing a radiation protection programme, including the designation of controlled areas and supervised areas, and workplace monitoring and individual monitoring;

  • Periodic maintenance and servicing of nuclear gauges;

  • Periodic checks on the operation and effectiveness of safety systems;

  • Periodic safety audits of operations;

  • Establishement of dose investigation levels;

  • Procedures for leak testing of radioactive sources;

  • Inventories for radioactive sources and radiation generators, supported by periodic accountancy checks and records, and records of the movement of radiation sources.

Control measures II-13. Local rules developed by the operating organization are expected to specifically address the actions to be taken and the persons responsible. A sample structure of the local rules is provided in Table II–2 indicating some of the important elements.
Control measures III-1. A nuclear gauge containing a 9.25 GBq 137Cs source was stolen; the overall mass was 45 kg including the lead shielding.
Control measures III-2. The gauge could not be located despite an extensive search operation performed using high sensitivity radiation survey instruments.
Control measures III-3. It was considered that the source was likely to be still inside the lead housing of the gauge. The gauge had adequate lead shielding and a locking arrangement to prevent inadvertent removal of the radioactive source from the device by members of the public. As long as the radioactive source remained inside the lead housing of the gauge, it was not expected to pose a significant radiological hazard to members of the public.
Control measures III-4. A radioactive source (137Cs, 260 GBq) from a level gauge in a paper mill was stolen by a worker, apparently out of curiosity. The source was destroyed using a grinding machine, which resulted in very substantial contamination of the premises of the paper mill.
Control measures III-5. One hundred and fifty persons (workers and members of their families) had external contamination of the body and internal contamination from 137Cs. The maximum internal exposure was approximately 150 mSv committed effective dose. Deterministic radiation effects were not observed among the individuals exposed.
Control measures III-6. Substantial efforts to decontaminate the premises proved ineffective and the three story building was demolished and the contaminated rubble disposed of.
Description of the incident III-7. The incident involved a level gauge1 containing a 1.85 GBq 137Cs source. The source fell out of the shielded housing onto the ground below. A worker subsequently picked up the source and took it to a control room, where it remained for almost two days.
Description of the incident III-8. The presence of an unshielded source was eventually recognized by a supervisor who was investigating the non-operation of the gauge. He immediately threw the source out of the window, after which he buried it in a soft mud bank, around which he set up an appropriate exclusion zone.
Description of the incident III-9 The source was subsequently recovered by a qualified expert and placed in a shielded container.
Doses to workers III-10. Workers did not wear personal dosimeters. Dose rate measurements and a reconstruction of the incident were used to estimate the doses received by the worker and the supervisor. The results are given in Table III–1; the doses received could have been considerably higher.
Lessons identified III-11. Nuclear gauges are a very common application, and it is extremely rare for the source to fall out under normal operating conditions. In this case, the source housing was subject to constant vibration, and this was a major factor in a securing bolt becoming loose. This problem can be addressed at the design stage, for example through the addition of a locking pin. Operating organizations also need to ensure that regular checks on the integrity of source housings are undertaken, especially where harsh environmental factors exist.
Lessons identified III-12. An early indication of the loss of the source was provided by the failure of the gauge system itself. Gauge operating staff need to be aware of this and put procedures in place to immediately check the location of the source in the event of such a failure.
Lessons identified III-13. Providing workers with suitable information, instruction and training is important — even for those who do not directly work with radiation sources. In this case, simple radiation awareness training (including the location of the sources on the site, a description of what the sources look like inside and outside their containers, basic precautions and whom to contact) could have helped avoid any radiation exposures.
Description of the incident III-14. As part of a refurbishment of a brewery, four liquid level gauges, each containing a 3.7 GBq 241Am source, were removed from a production line and put inside a store before disposal. The sources were beyond their recommended working life, were no longer certified as special form radioactive material, and required a Type B container for transport from the site.
Description of the incident III-15. The 241Am source assembly of each gauge was sandwiched between stainless steel plates, attached to which were a shutter mechanism and mounting bracket. The radioactive material was incorporated within a thin-walled, stainless steel tube.
Description of the incident III-16. The company that was contracted to dispose of the sources brought only one Type B container to the site. The contractor intended to dismantle the gauges on the site and transport all four 241Am sources in one consignment. It was discovered that the source assemblies, which were each about 2 cm long, were fixed in place with adhesive. The contractor’s employee forced them out of their housing using a screwdriver and placed them in the Type B container. The sources were damaged in the process.
Description of the incident III-17. The work was performed in the back of a vehicle in the car park of the brewery. The driver then went to a second location about 200 km away to collect some more sources for disposal before travelling to the disposal company site.
Description of the incident III-18. A few days later, it was discovered that the container and the vehicle were contaminated with 241Am. Subsequent monitoring revealed that the contamination was more extensive, and included other vehicles and other premises (including homes). The company reported the incident and a detailed investigation commenced. The investigation showed the following:
  • The contractor did not discuss the job with the brewery or with the contractor’s qualified expert and had inaccurate information about the size of the gauges and the sources.

  • Alternative methods of work had not been considered.

  • There was doubt about whether the available workplace monitoring instrument was functional; when the batteries of the instrument were checked some days later these were found to be completely discharged.

Radiological consequences III-19. The doses received were primarily due to intakes of 241Am; the committed effective dose equivalents were estimated to be 20 mSv and 2 mSv for two workers of the disposal contractor, and below 1 mSv for the wife of the first worker.
Lessons identified III-20. The following lessons were identified from the incident:
  • Equipment holding radioactive sources needs, wherever possible, to be transported with the source undisturbed to suitable facilities before dismantling takes place.

  • Where removal of sources on the site is unavoidable, close liaison between all the operating organizations involved (and their respective qualified experts) needs to take place with a view to ensuring that adequate facilities are available for the work to proceed safely.

  • Local rules have to clearly and unambiguously state what needs to be done (or not done) if conditions change during the work.

  • Emergency procedures need to be incorporated into local rules, made known to relevant persons, and practised.

  • After source manipulations, appropriate monitoring needs to be undertaken. In situations such as this, contamination always needs to be considered possible; not just from the manipulation procedure, but also owing to degradation of the sources due to the environment in which they were used.

  • The operation of workplace monitoring instruments needs to be checked before each use (e.g. using a check source). Spare batteries have to be carried with the instrument.

Lessons identified III-21. An operating organization reported that the shutter on a gauge that was inside the cupola of a refractory had fallen off, resulting in the exposure of members of public. The gauge contained a 300 GBq 137Cs source.
Lessons identified III-22. Inspectors from the regulatory body visited the site and established that a total of 10 persons had been exposed to radiation; the initial estimated effective doses ranged from 0.5 to 13 mSv. The final dose estimate confirmed that four persons received doses greater than 10 mSv.
Lessons identified III-23. The gauge was removed, the shielded shutter was welded back in place, and the gauge was sent back to the manufacturer for failure analysis. The analysis revealed that the shutter was badly corroded and rusted, which was unexpected because it was only five years old.
Lessons identified III-24. A contributing factor in the failure was maintenance work that occurred while the gauge was still attached to the cupola. The operating organization used pneumatic chipping hammers to remove a refractory brick layer from inside the cupola. It is believed that the vibrations caused the badly rusted and corroded shield to fall off. The gauge location was such that visual inspections were difficult.
Lessons identified III-25. To prevent a recurrence of the incident, the operating organization received a new gauge housed in stainless steel with a stainless steel shutter.
Lessons identified III-26. The operating organization arranged to have the gauges removed by a licensed service provider if work on the cupola requires pneumatic hammers or other vibrational work. While the sources are removed, the service provider will inspect the gauges for signs of corrosion or other signs of damage or potential failure.
Lessons identified III-27. The gauge has been placed in the same location where visual inspections are difficult. Consequently, if no work requiring gauge removal occurs within three years from the last inspection, the operating organization has arranged for a service provider visit the facility for the purpose of removing the gauges to perform a thorough visual inspection.
Lessons identified [III–1] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Event Report Database.